Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CSNRvsREMXETF Comparison
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) and VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CSNR's top 3 sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. In contrast, REMX's top sector exposures are Materials, CSNR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.58% for REMX. CSNR is up 18.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$26M in YTD flows. REMX performs better with 31.47% YTD performance, and +$786M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSNR and REMX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CSNR vs REMX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSNR REMX | -0.52%+6.37% | +19.80%+32.65% | +18.97%+31.47% | +56.79%+139.90% | n/a+29.69% | n/a+36.47% |
| Flows | CSNR REMX | +$21M+$183M | +$27M+$881M | +$26M+$786M | +$51M+$1.79B | -+$1.71B | -+$1.67B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSNR REMX | +20.68%+44.73% | +18.07%+39.35% | n/a+33.20% | n/a+34.83% |
| Max drawdown | CSNR REMX | -5.16%-15.34% | -14.28%-24.86% | n/a-61.47% | n/a-72.86% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSNR REMX | 9d30d | 46d112d | n/a908d | n/a1437d |
CSNR | REMX | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.84 | $93.81 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $36.69 | $96.92 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CSNR | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CSNR | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.84 | $93.81 |
| 1D performance | +0.41% | -3.21% |
| AuM | $86.08 M | $2.96 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.58% |
CSNR | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Cohen & Steers | VanEck |
| Benchmark | - | MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index |
| N° of holdings | 48 | 20 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 6, 2025 | October 27, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CSNR and REMX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CSNR is up 18.97% year-to-date (YTD), while REMX has returned 31.47%. That puts REMX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSNR or REMX?
Year-to-date, the CSNR ETF saw +$26M in flows, compared to +$786M for REMX.
Which ETF is more volatile: CSNR or REMX?
Over the past year, CSNR had a volatility of 18.07%, while REMX experienced 39.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: CSNR or REMX?
As of March 11, 2026, CSNR holds $86.08 M in assets under management (AUM), while REMX manages $2.96 B.
What sectors do the CSNR and REMX ETFs invest in?
CSNR leans toward sectors like Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, REMX focuses on Materials.
What are the top holdings of the CSNR ETF and REMX ETF?
CSNR top holdings include EXXON, CH1300646267 and SHELL PLC. REMX holds in its top three: ALBEMARLE, RARE-EARTH and XIAMEN TUNGST.
Which ETF is more diversified: CSNR or REMX?
CSNR holds 55 securities with 51.51% of its assets in the top 15. REMX has 24 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.5%.
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
How PFIC Rules Could Trigger a Year-End Shock for Mining ETFs
Cohen & Steers Enters the ETF World with Triple Launch
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
