CSNRvsCGWETF Comparison
VS
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CSNR's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Materials and Consumer Staples. In contrast, CGW's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Materials. CSNR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.59% for CGW. CSNR is up 20.65% year-to-date (YTD) with +$36M in YTD flows. CGW performs worse with 4.64% YTD performance, and +$26M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSNR and CGW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CSNR vs CGW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSNR CGW | +3.19%+5.42% | +7.05%-0.43% | +20.65%+4.64% | +55.69%+15.62% | n/a+40.28% | n/a+37.15% |
| Flows | CSNR CGW | +$10M-$496K | +$31M+$16M | +$36M+$26M | +$45M+$6M | --$196M | --$53M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSNR CGW | +21.29%+14.48% | +15.57%+12.22% | n/a+13.56% | n/a+15.63% |
| Max drawdown | CSNR CGW | -7.77%-9.88% | -7.77%-9.88% | n/a-15.88% | n/a-32.65% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSNR CGW | 38d60d | 38d60d | n/a140d | n/a862d |
Trading data
CSNR | CGW | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.85 | $65.16 |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $37.01 | $65.79 |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCSNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CSNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.85 | $65.16 |
| 1D performance | -0.43% | -0.95% |
| AuM | $97.15 M | $1.05 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
CSNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Cohen & Steers | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Global Water Index |
| N° of holdings | 52 | 60 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 6, 2025 | May 14, 2007 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CSNR
USA
40.51%
Canada
18.72%
United Kingdom
7.63%
Other
33.14%
CGW
USA
58.28%
Brazil
12.68%
United Kingdom
9.99%
Other
19.05%
Sectors
CSNR
Energy
34.66%
Materials
31.97%
Consumer Staples
7.82%
Other
25.55%
CGW
Utilities
46.97%
Industrials
37.72%
Other
15.31%
Advertisement
Diversification
CSNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.77%
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
68.83%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
CSNR
EXXON
6.36%
TOTALENERGIES SE
6.27%
SHELL PLC
5.65%
CH1300646267
4.10%
SUNCOR ENERGY
3.86%
CONOCOPHILLIPS
3.43%
US7594701077
2.87%
NEWMONT CORP
2.66%
MOWI ASA
2.66%
CORTEVA INC
2.65%
NUTRIEN LTD
2.61%
GLENCORE PLC
2.51%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.42%
THE MOSAIC COMPANY
2.39%
BARRICK GOLD
2.33%
CGW
COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BASICO
9.69%
AMERICAN WATER WORKS
8.77%
XYLEM
6.87%
ESSENTIAL UTILITIES INC
6.06%
US92338C1036
5.18%
UNITED UTILITIES GROUP
4.76%
ECOLAB
3.96%
SEVERN TRENT
3.94%
ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
3.51%
GEBERIT
3.41%
WTTS WTER TECH
2.91%
PENTAIR PLC
2.57%
CORE & MAIN
2.55%
ZURN WATER SOLUTIONS CORP
2.45%
AMERICAN STATES WATER
2.19%
Frequently asked questions about CSNR and CGW
How have the CSNR and CGW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 24, 2026, CSNR is up 20.65% year-to-date (YTD), while CGW has returned 4.64%. That puts CSNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSNR or CGW?
Year-to-date, the CSNR ETF saw +$36M in flows, compared to +$26M for CGW.
Which ETF is more volatile: CSNR or CGW?
Over the past year, CSNR had a volatility of 15.57%, while CGW experienced 12.22%.
Which ETF is bigger: CSNR or CGW?
As of April 24, 2026, CSNR holds $97.15 M in assets under management (AUM), while CGW manages $1.05 B.
What sectors do the CSNR and CGW ETFs invest in?
CSNR leans toward sectors like Energy, Materials and Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, CGW focuses on Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CSNR ETF and CGW ETF?
CSNR top holdings include EXXON, TOTALENERGIES SE and SHELL PLC. CGW holds in its top three: COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BASICO, AMERICAN WATER WORKS and XYLEM.
Which ETF is more diversified: CSNR or CGW?
CSNR holds 59 securities with 52.77% of its assets in the top 15. CGW has 62 securities and a top 15 weight of 68.83%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CSNR & CGW
Cohen & Steers Enters the ETF World with Triple Launch
February 10, 2025
CSNR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
CGW
Advertisement
Advertisement
