CSNRvsCGWETF Comparison
VS
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CSNR's top 3 sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Industrials. In contrast, CGW's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Materials. CSNR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.59% for CGW. CSNR is up 13.27% year-to-date (YTD) with +$40M in YTD flows. CGW performs worse with 0.58% YTD performance, and +$31M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSNR and CGW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CSNR vs CGW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/19/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSNR CGW | -5.41%+1.69% | -2.42%+0.10% | +13.27%+0.58% | +32.58%+5.54% | n/a+29.82% | n/a+31.45% |
| Flows | CSNR CGW | -$2M+$5M | +$15M+$5M | +$40M+$31M | +$49M+$16M | --$179M | --$82M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSNR CGW | +16.17%+15.62% | +16.49%+12.87% | n/a+13.68% | n/a+15.68% |
| Max drawdown | CSNR CGW | -8.25%-8.44% | -8.25%-10.52% | n/a-15.88% | n/a-32.65% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSNR CGW | 67d65d | 67d112d | n/a140d | n/a862d |
Trading data
CSNR | CGW | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.82 | $63.51 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $35.39 | $62.78 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCSNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CSNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.82 | $63.51 |
| 1D performance | -1.61% | +1.16% |
| AuM | $94.69 M | $1.01 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
CSNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Cohen & Steers | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Global Water Index |
| N° of holdings | 47 | 65 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 6, 2025 | May 14, 2007 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CSNR
USA
38.1%
Canada
20.15%
Other
41.75%
CGW
USA
57.28%
Brazil
12.05%
United Kingdom
9.86%
Other
20.81%
Sectors
CSNR
Materials
34.3%
Energy
33.06%
Other
32.64%
CGW
Utilities
47.65%
Industrials
36.88%
Other
15.47%
Advertisement
Diversification
CSNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.46%
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
66.59%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
CSNR
EXXON
5.94%
TOTALENERGIES SE
5.24%
SHELL PLC
4.69%
CH1300646267
3.88%
SUNCOR ENERGY
3.81%
CONOCOPHILLIPS
3.09%
NUTRIEN LTD
2.90%
US7594701077
2.85%
NEWMONT CORP
2.85%
GLENCORE PLC
2.82%
BARRICK GOLD
2.56%
ENI
2.55%
CORTEVA INC
2.49%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.46%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC
2.33%
CGW
COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BASICO
8.66%
AMERICAN WATER WORKS
7.74%
XYLEM
7.72%
ESSENTIAL UTILITIES INC
5.85%
US92338C1036
5.13%
UNITED UTILITIES GROUP
4.28%
SEVERN TRENT
4.23%
ECOLAB
3.91%
ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
3.45%
GEBERIT
3.40%
WTTS WTER TECH
2.63%
AMERICAN STATES WATER
2.50%
ZURN WATER SOLUTIONS CORP
2.48%
PENTAIR PLC
2.38%
CORE & MAIN
2.25%
Frequently asked questions about CSNR and CGW
How have the CSNR and CGW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 19, 2026, CSNR is up 13.27% year-to-date (YTD), while CGW has returned 0.58%. That puts CSNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSNR or CGW?
Year-to-date, the CSNR ETF saw +$40M in flows, compared to +$31M for CGW.
Which ETF is more volatile: CSNR or CGW?
Over the past year, CSNR had a volatility of 16.49%, while CGW experienced 12.87%.
Which ETF is bigger: CSNR or CGW?
As of June 19, 2026, CSNR holds $94.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while CGW manages $1.01 B.
What sectors do the CSNR and CGW ETFs invest in?
CSNR leans toward sectors like Materials and Energy. Meanwhile, CGW focuses on Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CSNR ETF and CGW ETF?
CSNR top holdings include EXXON, TOTALENERGIES SE and SHELL PLC. CGW holds in its top three: COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BASICO, AMERICAN WATER WORKS and XYLEM.
Which ETF is more diversified: CSNR or CGW?
CSNR holds 51 securities with 50.46% of its assets in the top 15. CGW has 67 securities and a top 15 weight of 66.59%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CSNR & CGW
Cohen & Steers Enters the ETF World with Triple Launch
February 10, 2025
CSNR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
CGW
Advertisement
Advertisement
