CSMvsQDPLETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
-0.73%
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus ETF (CSM) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. CSM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. CSM is up 10.14% year-to-date (YTD) with -$15M in YTD flows. QDPL performs better with 12.06% YTD performance, and +$300M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSM and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CSM vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSM QDPL | +0.63%+1.34% | +1.12%+1.65% | +10.14%+12.06% | +15.89%+15.84% | +80.68%+73.85% | +77.08%+75.18% |
| Flows | CSM QDPL | -+$35M | -$4M+$119M | -$15M+$300M | -$21M+$420M | -$113M+$1.37B | -$206M+$1.52B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSM QDPL | +11.19%+10.24% | +12.55%+11.68% | +15.32%+13.54% | +17.27%+15.34% |
| Max drawdown | CSM QDPL | -3.81%-2.82% | -9.26%-8.32% | -18.18%-17.47% | -23.88%-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSM QDPL | 61d53d | 98d70d | 124d126d | 713d704d |
Trading data
CSM | QDPL | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $86.92 | $45.95 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $87.78 | $46.38 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSM | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CSM | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $86.92 | $45.95 |
| 1D performance | -0.98% | -0.93% |
| AuM | $516.33 M | $1.83 B |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
CSM | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | Credit Suisse 130/30 Large Cap Index | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 13, 2009 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CSM
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
CSM
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
CSM
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
CSM
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about CSM and QDPL
How have the CSM and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, CSM is up 10.14% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 12.06%. That puts QDPL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSM or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the CSM ETF saw -$15M in flows, compared to +$300M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: CSM or QDPL?
Over the past year, CSM had a volatility of 12.55%, while QDPL experienced 11.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: CSM or QDPL?
As of October 16, 2026, CSM holds $516.33 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.83 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about CSM & QDPL
Advertisement
Advertisement
