Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CSIOvsIGFETF Comparison
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Utilities, Industrials and Energy. CSIO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.39% for IGF. CSIO is up 10.79% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. IGF performs worse with 8.22% YTD performance, and +$290M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSIO and IGF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CSIO vs IGF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSIO IGF | +0.33%-1.34% | +10.26%+8.90% | +10.79%+8.22% | n/a+30.21% | n/a+58.58% | n/a+71.00% |
| Flows | CSIO IGF | +$4M+$177M | +$12M+$443M | +$4M+$290M | -+$2.40B | -+$3.99B | -+$4.62B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSIO IGF | +8.97%+9.90% | n/a+11.90% | n/a+11.89% | n/a+13.21% |
| Max drawdown | CSIO IGF | -3.76%-4.11% | n/a-8.54% | n/a-14.82% | n/a-20.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSIO IGF | 10d11d | n/a14d | n/a321d | n/a747d |
CSIO | IGF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $66.50 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $66.59 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CSIO | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CSIO | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $66.50 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.14% |
| AuM | $24.26 M | $9.96 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.39% |
CSIO | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Cohen & Steers | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Global Infrastructure Index |
| N° of holdings | 23 | 68 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 10, 2025 | December 10, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CSIO and IGF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CSIO is up 10.79% year-to-date (YTD), while IGF has returned 8.22%. That puts CSIO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSIO or IGF?
Year-to-date, the CSIO ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$290M for IGF.
Which ETF is bigger: CSIO or IGF?
As of March 11, 2026, CSIO holds $24.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while IGF manages $9.96 B.
What sectors do the CSIO and IGF ETFs invest in?
CSIO leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, IGF focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the CSIO ETF and IGF ETF?
CSIO top holdings include CSX, NEXTERA ENERGY and TC ENERGY CORP. IGF holds in its top three: NEXTERA ENERGY, ES0105046017 and TRANSURBAN GRP REIT.
Which ETF is more diversified: CSIO or IGF?
CSIO holds 23 securities with 69.36% of its assets in the top 15. IGF has 78 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.22%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
