CSIOvsIGFETF Comparison
ETF 1
CSIO
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF
This fund is part of
Infrastructure
-0.9%
VS
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Utilities, Industrials and Energy. CSIO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.37% for IGF. CSIO is up 14.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$26M in YTD flows. IGF performs worse with 4.47% YTD performance, and +$1.10B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSIO and IGF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CSIO vs IGF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/14/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSIO IGF | -0.94%-3.99% | -1.64%-5.05% | +14.30%+4.47% | n/a+6.79% | n/a+52.97% | n/a+57.88% |
| Flows | CSIO IGF | -$0K+$58M | +$4M+$27M | +$26M+$1.10B | -+$1.75B | -+$4.84B | -+$5.52B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSIO IGF | +8.63%+8.83% | n/a+10.19% | n/a+11.89% | n/a+13.29% |
| Max drawdown | CSIO IGF | -3.09%-6.25% | n/a-7.44% | n/a-9.81% | n/a-20.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSIO IGF | 50d78d | n/a197d | n/a69d | n/a747d |
Trading data
CSIO | IGF | |
Last sale 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM | $63.12 | |
| Previous close 09/14/2026 | $63.39 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSIO
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCSIO | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CSIO | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $63.12 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.43% |
| AuM | $45.81 M | $10.24 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.37% |
Characteristics
CSIO | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Cohen & Steers | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Global Infrastructure Index |
| N° of holdings | 30 | 75 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 10, 2025 | December 10, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CSIO
USA
55.25%
Canada
8.78%
Other
35.97%
IGF
USA
36.15%
Spain
9.1%
Canada
8.36%
Australia
7.27%
Other
39.12%
Sectors
CSIO
Utilities
46.8%
Industrials
27.13%
Energy
19.65%
Other
6.42%
IGF
Utilities
39.32%
Industrials
38.02%
Energy
19.76%
Other
2.9%
Advertisement
Diversification
CSIO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
69.1%
IGF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.77%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CSIO
CSX Corp.
7.28%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
6.38%
TC Energy Corp.
6.10%
Entergy Corp.
5.68%
Union Pacific Corp.
5.06%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
5.03%
APA Group
4.42%
Ameren Corp.
4.07%
American Tower Corp.
3.94%
Alliant Energy Corp.
3.88%
Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA
3.84%
Ferrovial NV
3.62%
Evergy, Inc.
3.37%
International Container Terminal Services, Inc.
3.30%
Tenaga Nasional Bhd.
3.15%
IGF
Transurban Group Ltd.
5.24%
Aena S.M.E. SA
5.16%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
4.80%
Enbridge, Inc.
4.06%
Iberdrola SA
3.94%
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico SAB de CV
3.38%
Auckland International Airport Ltd.
3.28%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
2.91%
The Southern Co.
2.79%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.64%
Getlink SE
2.52%
TC Energy Corp.
2.38%
Enel SpA
2.35%
Constellation Energy Corp.
2.20%
National Grid Plc
2.12%
Frequently asked questions about CSIO and IGF
How have the CSIO and IGF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 14, 2026, CSIO is up 14.3% year-to-date (YTD), while IGF has returned 4.47%. That puts CSIO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSIO or IGF?
Year-to-date, the CSIO ETF saw +$26M in flows, compared to +$1.10B for IGF.
Which ETF is bigger: CSIO or IGF?
As of September 14, 2026, CSIO holds $45.81 M in assets under management (AUM), while IGF manages $10.24 B.
What sectors do the CSIO and IGF ETFs invest in?
CSIO leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, IGF focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the CSIO ETF and IGF ETF?
CSIO top holdings include CSX Corp., The Williams Cos., Inc. and TC Energy Corp.. IGF holds in its top three: Transurban Group Ltd., Aena S.M.E. SA and NextEra Energy, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CSIO or IGF?
CSIO holds 30 securities with 69.1% of its assets in the top 15. IGF has 76 securities and a top 15 weight of 49.77%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CSIO & IGF
Advertisement
