CQQQvsKPROETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
KPRO
KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.35%
Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) belongs to the China Blended Cap segment. KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) is part of the Options Strategies segment. CQQQ's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, KPRO's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. CQQQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 1% for KPRO. CQQQ is down -11.41% year-to-date (YTD) with +$320M in YTD flows. KPRO performs better with -6.26% YTD performance, and +$709K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CQQQ and KPRO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CQQQ vs KPRO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CQQQ KPRO | -10.80%-1.72% | -13.87%-1.42% | -11.41%-6.26% | -14.03%-7.96% | +23.73%n/a | -30.36%n/a |
| Flows | CQQQ KPRO | -$162M+$0K | +$2M-$659K | +$320M+$709K | +$1.62B+$709K | +$2.19B- | +$2.19B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CQQQ KPRO | +29.91%+6.36% | +29.50%+9.01% | +29.58%n/a | +32.74%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CQQQ KPRO | -19.19%-3.91% | -24.05%-11.33% | -27.20%n/a | -61.50%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CQQQ KPRO | 77d35d | 344d344d | 375dn/a | 1759dn/a |
Trading data
CQQQ | KPRO | |
Last sale 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.17 | $26.38 |
| Previous close 09/15/2026 | $46.11 | $26.32 |
| Consolidated volume 09/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KPRO
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCQQQ | KPRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CQQQ | KPRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.17 | $26.38 |
| 1D performance | +0.13% | +0.21% |
| AuM | $2.74 B | $3.29 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 1% |
Characteristics
CQQQ | KPRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 174 | 33 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2009 | February 8, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CQQQ
China
86.93%
Ireland
11.22%
Other
1.85%
KPRO
China
74.31%
Ireland
7.25%
Other
18.44%
Sectors
CQQQ
Technology
63.97%
Consumer Services
12.58%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.22%
Other
12.22%
KPRO
Technology
35.81%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
24.89%
Consumer Services
12.98%
Other
26.32%
Advertisement
Diversification
CQQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
64.9%
KPRO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.39%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CQQQ
Meituan
12.24%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
11.22%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
10.36%
Baidu, Inc.
8.03%
Kuaishou Technology
4.88%
Hua Hong Grace Semiconductor Ltd.
3.50%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
2.10%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
1.93%
Horizon Robotics
1.76%
SenseTime Group, Inc.
1.66%
Bilibili, Inc.
1.54%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
1.50%
Sunny Optical Technology (Group) Co., Ltd.
1.46%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
1.42%
Kingboard Laminates Holdings Ltd.
1.31%
KPRO
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
9.01%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.57%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
7.25%
Meituan
7.20%
NetEase, Inc.
5.58%
JD.com, Inc.
3.87%
Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.
3.79%
KE Holdings, Inc.
3.51%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
3.39%
Kuaishou Technology
3.35%
JD Health International, Inc.
3.28%
Kanzhun Ltd.
3.20%
Bilibili, Inc.
3.19%
Baidu, Inc.
3.16%
TAL Education Group
3.03%
Frequently asked questions about CQQQ and KPRO
How have the CQQQ and KPRO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, CQQQ is down -11.41% year-to-date (YTD), while KPRO has lost -6.26%. That puts KPRO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CQQQ or KPRO?
Year-to-date, the CQQQ ETF saw +$320M in flows, compared to +$709K for KPRO.
Which ETF is more volatile: CQQQ or KPRO?
Over the past year, CQQQ had a volatility of 29.5%, while KPRO experienced 9.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: CQQQ or KPRO?
As of September 15, 2026, CQQQ holds $2.74 B in assets under management (AUM), while KPRO manages $3.29 M.
What sectors do the CQQQ and KPRO ETFs invest in?
CQQQ leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, KPRO focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services.
What are the top holdings of the CQQQ ETF and KPRO ETF?
CQQQ top holdings include Meituan, PDD Holdings, Inc. and Tencent Holdings Ltd.. KPRO holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and PDD Holdings, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CQQQ or KPRO?
CQQQ holds 180 securities with 64.9% of its assets in the top 15. KPRO has 33 securities and a top 15 weight of 70.39%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CQQQ & KPRO
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
February 19, 2024
CQQQ
China's Stock Market Struggles Amid Evergrande Crisis
February 5, 2024
CQQQ
Advertisement
Advertisement
