CQQQvsKBUFETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
KBUF
KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.19%
Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) belongs to the China Blended Cap segment. KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) is part of the Options Strategies segment. CQQQ's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, KBUF's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. CQQQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.97% for KBUF. CQQQ is down -11.22% year-to-date (YTD) with +$283M in YTD flows. KBUF performs worse with -16.33% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CQQQ and KBUF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CQQQ vs KBUF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CQQQ KBUF | -10.62%-4.13% | -12.53%-4.28% | -11.22%-16.33% | -15.05%-18.85% | +25.47%n/a | -28.76%n/a |
| Flows | CQQQ KBUF | -$199M+$1K | -$35M+$630K | +$283M+$3M | +$1.59B+$3M | +$2.16B- | +$2.16B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CQQQ KBUF | +29.84%+12.10% | +29.46%+13.84% | +29.57%n/a | +32.73%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CQQQ KBUF | -19.19%-8.40% | -24.05%-21.92% | -26.33%n/a | -61.50%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CQQQ KBUF | 78d36d | 345d345d | 374dn/a | 1760dn/a |
Trading data
CQQQ | KBUF | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.27 | $25.51 |
| Previous close 09/16/2026 | $46.18 | $25.58 |
| Consolidated volume 09/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KBUF
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCQQQ | KBUF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CQQQ | KBUF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.27 | $25.51 |
| 1D performance | +0.19% | -0.25% |
| AuM | $2.71 B | $6.38 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.97% |
Characteristics
CQQQ | KBUF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 174 | 33 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2009 | February 8, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
CQQQ
China
86.93%
Ireland
11.22%
Other
1.85%
KBUF
China
77.26%
Ireland
7.53%
Other
15.2%
Sectors
CQQQ
Technology
63.97%
Consumer Services
12.58%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.22%
Other
12.22%
KBUF
Technology
37.23%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
25.88%
Consumer Services
13.5%
Other
23.4%
Advertisement
Diversification
CQQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
64.9%
KBUF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.19%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CQQQ
Meituan
12.24%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
11.22%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
10.36%
Baidu, Inc.
8.03%
Kuaishou Technology
4.88%
Hua Hong Grace Semiconductor Ltd.
3.50%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
2.10%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
1.93%
Horizon Robotics
1.76%
SenseTime Group, Inc.
1.66%
Bilibili, Inc.
1.54%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
1.50%
Sunny Optical Technology (Group) Co., Ltd.
1.46%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
1.42%
Kingboard Laminates Holdings Ltd.
1.31%
KBUF
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
9.37%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.87%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
7.53%
Meituan
7.49%
NetEase, Inc.
5.80%
JD.com, Inc.
4.03%
Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.
3.94%
KE Holdings, Inc.
3.65%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
3.53%
Kuaishou Technology
3.48%
JD Health International, Inc.
3.41%
Kanzhun Ltd.
3.33%
Bilibili, Inc.
3.32%
Baidu, Inc.
3.28%
TAL Education Group
3.15%
Frequently asked questions about CQQQ and KBUF
How have the CQQQ and KBUF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 16, 2026, CQQQ is down -11.22% year-to-date (YTD), while KBUF has lost -16.33%. That puts CQQQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CQQQ or KBUF?
Year-to-date, the CQQQ ETF saw +$283M in flows, compared to +$3M for KBUF.
Which ETF is more volatile: CQQQ or KBUF?
Over the past year, CQQQ had a volatility of 29.46%, while KBUF experienced 13.84%.
Which ETF is bigger: CQQQ or KBUF?
As of September 16, 2026, CQQQ holds $2.71 B in assets under management (AUM), while KBUF manages $6.38 M.
What sectors do the CQQQ and KBUF ETFs invest in?
CQQQ leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, KBUF focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services.
What are the top holdings of the CQQQ ETF and KBUF ETF?
CQQQ top holdings include Meituan, PDD Holdings, Inc. and Tencent Holdings Ltd.. KBUF holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and PDD Holdings, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CQQQ or KBUF?
CQQQ holds 180 securities with 64.9% of its assets in the top 15. KBUF has 33 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.19%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CQQQ & KBUF
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
February 19, 2024
CQQQ
China's Stock Market Struggles Amid Evergrande Crisis
February 5, 2024
CQQQ
Advertisement
