CQQQvsGXCETF Comparison
VS
Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and State Street SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. CQQQ's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, GXC's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. CQQQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.59% for GXC. CQQQ is down -11.41% year-to-date (YTD) with +$320M in YTD flows. GXC performs better with -9.53% YTD performance, and +$23M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CQQQ and GXC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CQQQ vs GXC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CQQQ GXC | -10.80%-4.18% | -13.87%-4.52% | -11.41%-9.53% | -14.03%-13.05% | +23.73%+29.92% | -30.36%-12.05% |
| Flows | CQQQ GXC | -$162M+$9M | +$2M+$22M | +$320M+$23M | +$1.62B+$48M | +$2.19B-$403M | +$2.19B-$649M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CQQQ GXC | +29.91%+17.90% | +29.50%+18.66% | +29.58%+22.40% | +32.74%+24.74% |
| Max drawdown | CQQQ GXC | -19.19%-7.81% | -24.05%-19.17% | -27.20%-23.08% | -61.50%-47.77% |
| Max drawdown duration | CQQQ GXC | 77d50d | 344d348d | 375d284d | 1759d1437d |
Trading data
CQQQ | GXC | |
Last sale 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.17 | $86.42 |
| Previous close 09/15/2026 | $46.11 | $87.28 |
| Consolidated volume 09/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CQQQ | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CQQQ | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.17 | $86.42 |
| 1D performance | +0.13% | -0.99% |
| AuM | $2.74 B | $464.12 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
CQQQ | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index | S&P China BMI Index |
| N° of holdings | 174 | 1173 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2009 | March 20, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CQQQ
China
86.93%
Ireland
11.22%
Other
1.85%
GXC
China
88.27%
Other
11.73%
Sectors
CQQQ
Technology
63.97%
Consumer Services
12.58%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.22%
Other
12.22%
GXC
Technology
24.23%
Finance
20.15%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
14.58%
Industrials
9.29%
Other
31.75%
Advertisement
Diversification
CQQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
64.9%
GXC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.88%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CQQQ
Meituan
12.24%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
11.22%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
10.36%
Baidu, Inc.
8.03%
Kuaishou Technology
4.88%
Hua Hong Grace Semiconductor Ltd.
3.50%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
2.10%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
1.93%
Horizon Robotics
1.76%
SenseTime Group, Inc.
1.66%
Bilibili, Inc.
1.54%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
1.50%
Sunny Optical Technology (Group) Co., Ltd.
1.46%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
1.42%
Kingboard Laminates Holdings Ltd.
1.31%
GXC
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
10.40%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
8.08%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.32%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.13%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
1.96%
Meituan
1.88%
Xiaomi Corp.
1.80%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.60%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.38%
NetEase, Inc.
1.31%
JD.com, Inc.
1.29%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.26%
Baidu, Inc.
0.88%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.81%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
0.78%
Frequently asked questions about CQQQ and GXC
How have the CQQQ and GXC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, CQQQ is down -11.41% year-to-date (YTD), while GXC has lost -9.53%. That puts GXC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CQQQ or GXC?
Year-to-date, the CQQQ ETF saw +$320M in flows, compared to +$23M for GXC.
Which ETF is more volatile: CQQQ or GXC?
Over the past year, CQQQ had a volatility of 29.5%, while GXC experienced 18.66%.
Which ETF is bigger: CQQQ or GXC?
As of September 15, 2026, CQQQ holds $2.74 B in assets under management (AUM), while GXC manages $464.12 M.
What sectors do the CQQQ and GXC ETFs invest in?
CQQQ leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, GXC focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the CQQQ ETF and GXC ETF?
CQQQ top holdings include Meituan, PDD Holdings, Inc. and Tencent Holdings Ltd.. GXC holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CQQQ or GXC?
CQQQ holds 180 securities with 64.9% of its assets in the top 15. GXC has 1236 securities and a top 15 weight of 38.88%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CQQQ & GXC
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
February 19, 2024
CQQQ
China's Stock Market Struggles Amid Evergrande Crisis
February 5, 2024
CQQQ
Chinese ETFs surge after Zero-COVID policy is relaxed
December 8, 2022
GXC
Advertisement
Advertisement
