CQQQvsFLCHETF Comparison
VS
Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. CQQQ's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, FLCH's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. CQQQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.19% for FLCH. CQQQ is down -11.22% year-to-date (YTD) with +$283M in YTD flows. FLCH performs worse with -11.43% YTD performance, and +$75M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CQQQ and FLCH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CQQQ vs FLCH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CQQQ FLCH | -10.62%-4.00% | -12.53%-2.89% | -11.22%-11.43% | -15.05%-15.38% | +25.47%+30.93% | -28.76%-11.04% |
| Flows | CQQQ FLCH | -$199M-$8M | -$35M+$57M | +$283M+$75M | +$1.59B+$123M | +$2.16B+$191M | +$2.16B+$217M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CQQQ FLCH | +29.84%+19.08% | +29.46%+19.53% | +29.57%+23.25% | +32.73%+26.42% |
| Max drawdown | CQQQ FLCH | -19.19%-7.43% | -24.05%-22.50% | -26.33%-22.50% | -61.50%-49.77% |
| Max drawdown duration | CQQQ FLCH | 78d29d | 345d349d | 374d349d | 1760d1422d |
Trading data
CQQQ | FLCH | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.27 | $20.81 |
| Previous close 09/16/2026 | $46.18 | $20.71 |
| Consolidated volume 09/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CQQQ | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CQQQ | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.27 | $20.81 |
| 1D performance | +0.19% | +0.48% |
| AuM | $2.71 B | $314.58 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
CQQQ | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index | FTSE China RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 174 | 893 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2009 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CQQQ
China
86.93%
Ireland
11.22%
Other
1.85%
FLCH
China
91.37%
Other
8.63%
Sectors
CQQQ
Technology
63.97%
Consumer Services
12.58%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.22%
Other
12.22%
FLCH
Technology
25.27%
Finance
21.73%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
15.64%
Industrials
7.78%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.36%
Other
22.22%
Advertisement
Diversification
CQQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
64.9%
FLCH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.86%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CQQQ
Meituan
12.24%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
11.22%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
10.36%
Baidu, Inc.
8.03%
Kuaishou Technology
4.88%
Hua Hong Grace Semiconductor Ltd.
3.50%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
2.10%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
1.93%
Horizon Robotics
1.76%
SenseTime Group, Inc.
1.66%
Bilibili, Inc.
1.54%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
1.50%
Sunny Optical Technology (Group) Co., Ltd.
1.46%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
1.42%
Kingboard Laminates Holdings Ltd.
1.31%
FLCH
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
12.67%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
9.30%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.64%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.66%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
2.35%
Xiaomi Corp.
2.27%
Meituan
2.25%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.68%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.66%
NetEase, Inc.
1.59%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.51%
JD.com, Inc.
1.35%
Baidu, Inc.
1.02%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.97%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
0.93%
Frequently asked questions about CQQQ and FLCH
How have the CQQQ and FLCH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 16, 2026, CQQQ is down -11.22% year-to-date (YTD), while FLCH has lost -11.43%. That puts CQQQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CQQQ or FLCH?
Year-to-date, the CQQQ ETF saw +$283M in flows, compared to +$75M for FLCH.
Which ETF is more volatile: CQQQ or FLCH?
Over the past year, CQQQ had a volatility of 29.46%, while FLCH experienced 19.53%.
Which ETF is bigger: CQQQ or FLCH?
As of September 16, 2026, CQQQ holds $2.71 B in assets under management (AUM), while FLCH manages $314.58 M.
What sectors do the CQQQ and FLCH ETFs invest in?
CQQQ leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, FLCH focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the CQQQ ETF and FLCH ETF?
CQQQ top holdings include Meituan, PDD Holdings, Inc. and Tencent Holdings Ltd.. FLCH holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CQQQ or FLCH?
CQQQ holds 180 securities with 64.9% of its assets in the top 15. FLCH has 998 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.86%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CQQQ & FLCH
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
February 19, 2024
CQQQ
China's Stock Market Struggles Amid Evergrande Crisis
February 5, 2024
CQQQ
Advertisement
Advertisement
