CQQQvsCNQQETF Comparison
VS
Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) belongs to the China Blended Cap segment. Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ) is part of the EM Awakening segment. CQQQ's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, CNQQ's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. CQQQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.75% for CNQQ. CQQQ is down -11.41% year-to-date (YTD) with +$320M in YTD flows. CNQQ performs better with -3.96% YTD performance, and +$35M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CQQQ and CNQQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CQQQ vs CNQQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CQQQ CNQQ | -10.80%-9.95% | -13.87%-12.15% | -11.41%-3.96% | -14.03%n/a | +23.73%n/a | -30.36%n/a |
| Flows | CQQQ CNQQ | -$162M- | +$2M+$19M | +$320M+$35M | +$1.62B- | +$2.19B- | +$2.19B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CQQQ CNQQ | +29.91%+32.34% | +29.50%n/a | +29.58%n/a | +32.74%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CQQQ CNQQ | -19.19%-16.45% | -24.05%n/a | -27.20%n/a | -61.50%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CQQQ CNQQ | 77d77d | 344dn/a | 375dn/a | 1759dn/a |
Trading data
CQQQ | CNQQ | |
Last sale 9/16/2026 at 6:48 PM | $46.30 | $22.27 |
| Previous close 09/15/2026 | $46.11 | $22.12 |
| Consolidated volume 09/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CQQQ | CNQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/16/2026 at 6:48 PM
Live
Closed
CQQQ | CNQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.30 | $22.27 |
| 1D performance | +0.41% | +0.67% |
| AuM | $2.74 B | $44.98 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
CQQQ | CNQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Rayliant Asset Management |
| Benchmark | FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index | Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech Index |
| N° of holdings | 174 | 100 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2009 | September 25, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CQQQ
China
86.93%
Ireland
11.22%
Other
1.85%
CNQQ
China
99.23%
Other
0.77%
Sectors
CQQQ
Technology
63.97%
Consumer Services
12.58%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.22%
Other
12.22%
CNQQ
Technology
56%
Industrials
14.9%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.48%
Other
18.62%
Advertisement
Diversification
CQQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
64.9%
CNQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.33%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CQQQ
Meituan
12.24%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
11.22%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
10.36%
Baidu, Inc.
8.03%
Kuaishou Technology
4.88%
Hua Hong Grace Semiconductor Ltd.
3.50%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
2.10%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
1.93%
Horizon Robotics
1.76%
SenseTime Group, Inc.
1.66%
Bilibili, Inc.
1.54%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
1.50%
Sunny Optical Technology (Group) Co., Ltd.
1.46%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
1.42%
Kingboard Laminates Holdings Ltd.
1.31%
CNQQ
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
8.98%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
8.81%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
6.64%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
6.00%
Meituan
3.47%
Xiaomi Corp.
3.44%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
2.64%
NetEase, Inc.
2.50%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
2.03%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
2.03%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
1.84%
Advanced Micro Fabrication Equipment, Inc. China
1.82%
GigaDevice Semiconductor, Inc.
1.78%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.77%
Montage Technology Co., Ltd.
1.58%
Frequently asked questions about CQQQ and CNQQ
How have the CQQQ and CNQQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, CQQQ is down -11.41% year-to-date (YTD), while CNQQ has lost -3.96%. That puts CNQQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CQQQ or CNQQ?
Year-to-date, the CQQQ ETF saw +$320M in flows, compared to +$35M for CNQQ.
Which ETF is bigger: CQQQ or CNQQ?
As of September 15, 2026, CQQQ holds $2.74 B in assets under management (AUM), while CNQQ manages $44.98 M.
What sectors do the CQQQ and CNQQ ETFs invest in?
CQQQ leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, CNQQ focuses on Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the CQQQ ETF and CNQQ ETF?
CQQQ top holdings include Meituan, PDD Holdings, Inc. and Tencent Holdings Ltd.. CNQQ holds in its top three: Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., Tencent Holdings Ltd. and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: CQQQ or CNQQ?
CQQQ holds 180 securities with 64.9% of its assets in the top 15. CNQQ has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 55.33%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CQQQ & CNQQ
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
February 19, 2024
CQQQ
China's Stock Market Struggles Amid Evergrande Crisis
February 5, 2024
CQQQ
Advertisement
Advertisement
