COWZvsQQWZETF Comparison
VS
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Healthcare, Technology and Energy. Both COWZ and QQWZ have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%. COWZ is up 17.48% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1.24B in YTD flows. QQWZ performs worse with 14.71% YTD performance, and +$18M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of COWZ and QQWZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
COWZ vs QQWZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/08/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | COWZ QQWZ | +0.46%+0.47% | +10.39%+1.09% | +17.48%+14.71% | +24.18%+21.95% | +46.19%n/a | +74.02%n/a |
| Flows | COWZ QQWZ | +$36M+$7M | -$226M+$13M | -$1.24B+$18M | -$3.69B+$31M | -$1.24B- | +$12.01B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | COWZ QQWZ | +15.42%+22.67% | +12.23%+17.38% | +15.11%n/a | +17.71%n/a |
| Max drawdown | COWZ QQWZ | -3.96%-10.98% | -5.93%-11.27% | -21.93%n/a | -21.93%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | COWZ QQWZ | 22d73d | 53d92d | 373dn/a | 373dn/a |
Trading data
COWZ | QQWZ | |
Last sale 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM | $69.50 | $28.68 |
| Previous close 09/08/2026 | $69.97 | $28.86 |
| Consolidated volume 09/08/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QQWZ
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCOWZ | QQWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
COWZ | QQWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $69.50 | $28.68 |
| 1D performance | -0.67% | -0.63% |
| AuM | $19.58 B | $46.89 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.49% |
Characteristics
COWZ | QQWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 98 | 98 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 16, 2016 | May 7, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
COWZ
USA
96.75%
Other
3.25%
QQWZ
USA
96.39%
Other
3.61%
Sectors
COWZ
Healthcare
19.94%
Technology
19.1%
Energy
11.82%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.36%
Industrials
9.55%
Telecommunication.
7.69%
Other
21.54%
QQWZ
Healthcare
19.84%
Technology
19.05%
Energy
11.78%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.33%
Industrials
9.51%
Telecommunication.
7.65%
Other
21.84%
Advertisement
Diversification
COWZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.86%
QQWZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.61%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
COWZ
Booking Holdings, Inc.
2.22%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
2.18%
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
2.06%
General Dynamics Corp.
2.05%
Intuit, Inc.
2.04%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
1.97%
AT&T, Inc.
1.95%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
1.93%
Comcast Corp.
1.92%
Salesforce, Inc.
1.90%
Uber Technologies, Inc.
1.90%
Adobe, Inc.
1.90%
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
1.89%
Ford Motor Co.
1.88%
QQWZ
Booking Holdings, Inc.
2.22%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
2.16%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
2.04%
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
2.04%
General Dynamics Corp.
2.03%
Intuit, Inc.
2.03%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
1.95%
AT&T, Inc.
1.93%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
1.92%
Comcast Corp.
1.92%
Adobe, Inc.
1.90%
Uber Technologies, Inc.
1.88%
Salesforce, Inc.
1.87%
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
1.86%
Ford Motor Co.
1.86%
Frequently asked questions about COWZ and QQWZ
How have the COWZ and QQWZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 8, 2026, COWZ is up 17.48% year-to-date (YTD), while QQWZ has returned 14.71%. That puts COWZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: COWZ or QQWZ?
Year-to-date, the COWZ ETF saw -$1.24B in flows, compared to +$18M for QQWZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: COWZ or QQWZ?
Over the past year, COWZ had a volatility of 12.23%, while QQWZ experienced 17.38%.
Which ETF is bigger: COWZ or QQWZ?
As of September 8, 2026, COWZ holds $19.58 B in assets under management (AUM), while QQWZ manages $46.89 M.
What sectors do the COWZ and QQWZ ETFs invest in?
COWZ leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Technology and Energy. Meanwhile, QQWZ focuses on Healthcare, Technology and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the COWZ ETF and QQWZ ETF?
COWZ top holdings include Booking Holdings, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb Co. and HCA Healthcare, Inc.. QQWZ holds in its top three: Booking Holdings, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb Co. and Marathon Petroleum Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: COWZ or QQWZ?
COWZ holds 98 securities with 29.86% of its assets in the top 15. QQWZ has 98 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.61%.
Advertisement
Latest news about COWZ & QQWZ
Hiding in Plain Sight: The Case for 'Unloved' Dividend Payers in ETFs
March 24, 2025
COWZ
There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow
October 10, 2024
COWZ
Recap of the Most Interesting Recent ETF Filings For the NYSE
June 29, 2023
COWZ
Pacer Cash Cows ETFs: Investing in Quality Stocks
April 28, 2023
COWZ
Advertisement
Advertisement
