COWZvsMFVLETF Comparison
VS
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. COWZ's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Technology and Energy. In contrast, MFVL's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Consumer Services. COWZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.5% for MFVL. COWZ is up 10.1% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1.24B in YTD flows. MFVL performs worse with 4.83% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of COWZ and MFVL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
COWZ vs MFVL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | COWZ MFVL | +4.94%+5.02% | +5.68%+6.03% | +10.10%+4.83% | +17.76%n/a | +38.81%n/a | +67.39%n/a |
| Flows | COWZ MFVL | -$199M-$846K | -$442M-$32K | -$1.24B+$4M | -$4.72B- | -$462M- | +$12.11B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | COWZ MFVL | +12.87%+15.38% | +11.67%n/a | +14.92%n/a | +17.62%n/a |
| Max drawdown | COWZ MFVL | -5.93%-5.95% | -5.93%n/a | -21.93%n/a | -21.93%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | COWZ MFVL | 53d44d | 53dn/a | 373dn/a | 373dn/a |
Trading data
COWZ | MFVL | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 4:13 PM | $67.38 | $21.79 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $65.92 | $21.27 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
COWZ | MFVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 4:13 PM
Live
Closed
COWZ | MFVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $67.38 | $21.79 |
| 1D performance | +2.21% | +2.44% |
| AuM | $18.47 B | $6.81 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.5% |
Characteristics
COWZ | MFVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Motley Fool Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index | Motley Fool Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 98 | 100 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 16, 2016 | December 8, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
COWZ
USA
97%
Other
3%
MFVL
USA
98.54%
Other
1.46%
Sectors
COWZ
Healthcare
19.73%
Technology
17.63%
Energy
11.06%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.96%
Industrials
10.2%
Telecommunication.
8.15%
Other
22.27%
MFVL
Technology
19.01%
Healthcare
15.16%
Consumer Services
14.5%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
12.51%
Energy
9.46%
Finance
9.09%
Other
20.27%
Advertisement
Diversification
COWZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.67%
MFVL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
57.42%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
COWZ
Booking Holdings, Inc.
2.22%
Uber Technologies, Inc.
2.18%
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
2.14%
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
2.13%
T-Mobile US, Inc.
2.08%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
2.08%
Altria Group, Inc.
2.07%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
2.04%
AT&T, Inc.
2.02%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
2.01%
Comcast Corp.
1.97%
General Dynamics Corp.
1.97%
Newmont Corp.
1.95%
Ford Motor Co.
1.92%
Pfizer Inc.
1.89%
MFVL
CVS Health Corp.
7.06%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
4.86%
The Walt Disney Co.
4.82%
T-Mobile US, Inc.
4.21%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
4.06%
Chevron Corp.
3.99%
Booking Holdings, Inc.
3.97%
Salesforce, Inc.
3.76%
Adobe, Inc.
3.75%
FedEx Corp.
3.72%
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
3.25%
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
3.17%
NIKE, Inc.
2.40%
Airbnb, Inc.
2.34%
Block, Inc.
2.06%
Frequently asked questions about COWZ and MFVL
How have the COWZ and MFVL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 27, 2026, COWZ is up 10.1% year-to-date (YTD), while MFVL has returned 4.83%. That puts COWZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: COWZ or MFVL?
Year-to-date, the COWZ ETF saw -$1.24B in flows, compared to +$4M for MFVL.
Which ETF is bigger: COWZ or MFVL?
As of July 27, 2026, COWZ holds $18.47 B in assets under management (AUM), while MFVL manages $6.81 M.
What sectors do the COWZ and MFVL ETFs invest in?
COWZ leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Technology and Energy. Meanwhile, MFVL focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Consumer Services.
What are the top holdings of the COWZ ETF and MFVL ETF?
COWZ top holdings include Booking Holdings, Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc. and Lowe's Companies, Inc.. MFVL holds in its top three: CVS Health Corp., Bristol Myers Squibb Co. and The Walt Disney Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: COWZ or MFVL?
COWZ holds 98 securities with 30.67% of its assets in the top 15. MFVL has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.42%.
Advertisement
Latest news about COWZ & MFVL
Hiding in Plain Sight: The Case for 'Unloved' Dividend Payers in ETFs
March 24, 2025
COWZ
There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow
October 10, 2024
COWZ
Recap of the Most Interesting Recent ETF Filings For the NYSE
June 29, 2023
COWZ
Pacer Cash Cows ETFs: Investing in Quality Stocks
April 28, 2023
COWZ
Advertisement
Advertisement
