COWZvsMFVLETF Comparison
VS
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. COWZ's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Energy. In contrast, MFVL's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. COWZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.5% for MFVL. COWZ is up 6.08% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1.02B in YTD flows. MFVL performs worse with -0.17% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of COWZ and MFVL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
COWZ vs MFVL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | COWZ MFVL | +0.64%+0.99% | +0.98%-1.40% | +6.08%-0.17% | +17.62%n/a | +44.76%n/a | +60.83%n/a |
| Flows | COWZ MFVL | -$141M+$814K | -$550M+$814K | -$1.02B+$5M | -$5.71B- | -$282M- | +$12.35B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | COWZ MFVL | +9.73%+13.21% | +11.20%n/a | +14.91%n/a | +17.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown | COWZ MFVL | -3.57%-4.63% | -4.99%n/a | -21.93%n/a | -21.93%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | COWZ MFVL | 10d36d | 88dn/a | 373dn/a | 373dn/a |
Trading data
COWZ | MFVL | |
Last sale 6/12/2026 at 5:54 PM | $64.04 | $20.24 |
| Previous close 06/11/2026 | $63.51 | $20.26 |
| Consolidated volume 06/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
COWZ | MFVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/12/2026 at 5:54 PM
Live
Closed
COWZ | MFVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $64.04 | $20.24 |
| 1D performance | +0.83% | -0.12% |
| AuM | $18.02 B | $7.29 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.5% |
Characteristics
COWZ | MFVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Motley Fool Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index | Motley Fool Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 99 | 97 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 16, 2016 | December 8, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
COWZ
USA
95.13%
Other
4.87%
MFVL
USA
99.6%
Other
0.4%
Sectors
COWZ
Health Care
20.98%
Information Techn.
20.81%
Energy
15.86%
Consumer Discreti.
12.47%
Industrials
9.76%
Communication Ser.
8.02%
Other
12.1%
MFVL
Information Techn.
25.33%
Consumer Discreti.
19.24%
Health Care
19.24%
Communication Ser.
10.79%
Energy
10.22%
Other
15.18%
Advertisement
Diversification
COWZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.04%
MFVL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.48%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
COWZ
QUALCOMM
2.27%
CONOCOPHILLIPS
2.13%
FORD MOTOR
2.11%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
2.08%
CVS HEALTH CORP
2.06%
NEWMONT CORP
2.05%
PFIZER
2.03%
ALTRIA GROUP
2.03%
BOOKING HOLDINGS
2.00%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
1.96%
DIAMONDBACK ENERGY
1.92%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
1.89%
MCKESSON
1.85%
AT&T
1.83%
SALESFORCE INC
1.83%
MFVL
CVS HEALTH CORP
5.29%
WALT DISNEY
4.97%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
4.91%
FEDEX
4.56%
ADOBE INC
4.48%
EXXON
4.40%
SALESFORCE INC
4.32%
CHEVRON TEXACO
4.31%
T-MOBILE US INC
4.23%
BOOKING HOLDINGS
3.90%
HCA HEALTHCARE
3.68%
PAYPAL HOLDINGS
3.60%
NIKE INC -CL
2.64%
AIRBNB
2.28%
BLOCK INC
1.91%
Frequently asked questions about COWZ and MFVL
How have the COWZ and MFVL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 11, 2026, COWZ is up 6.08% year-to-date (YTD), while MFVL has lost -0.17%. That puts COWZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: COWZ or MFVL?
Year-to-date, the COWZ ETF saw -$1.02B in flows, compared to +$5M for MFVL.
Which ETF is bigger: COWZ or MFVL?
As of June 11, 2026, COWZ holds $18.02 B in assets under management (AUM), while MFVL manages $7.29 M.
What sectors do the COWZ and MFVL ETFs invest in?
COWZ leans toward sectors like Health Care, Information Technology and Energy. Meanwhile, MFVL focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the COWZ ETF and MFVL ETF?
COWZ top holdings include QUALCOMM, CONOCOPHILLIPS and FORD MOTOR. MFVL holds in its top three: CVS HEALTH CORP, WALT DISNEY and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB.
Which ETF is more diversified: COWZ or MFVL?
COWZ holds 100 securities with 30.04% of its assets in the top 15. MFVL has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.48%.
Advertisement
Latest news about COWZ & MFVL
Hiding in Plain Sight: The Case for 'Unloved' Dividend Payers in ETFs
March 24, 2025
COWZ
There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow
October 10, 2024
COWZ
Recap of the Most Interesting Recent ETF Filings For the NYSE
June 29, 2023
COWZ
Pacer Cash Cows ETFs: Investing in Quality Stocks
April 28, 2023
COWZ
Advertisement
Advertisement
