Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
COWZvsMFVLETF Comparison
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. COWZ's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Energy and Information Technology. In contrast, MFVL's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. COWZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.5% for MFVL. COWZ is up 3.77% year-to-date (YTD) with -$479M in YTD flows. MFVL performs worse with -0.51% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of COWZ and MFVL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
COWZ vs MFVL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | COWZ MFVL | -2.70%-3.40% | +2.79%-0.69% | +3.77%-0.51% | +18.64%n/a | +46.70%n/a | +70.87%n/a |
| Flows | COWZ MFVL | -$15M+$2M | -$628M+$6M | -$479M+$4M | -$8.01B- | +$758M- | +$13.19B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | COWZ MFVL | +10.92%+11.41% | +17.71%n/a | +15.64%n/a | +17.75%n/a |
| Max drawdown | COWZ MFVL | -3.83%-4.18% | -14.75%n/a | -21.93%n/a | -21.93%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | COWZ MFVL | 12d12d | 103dn/a | 373dn/a | 373dn/a |
COWZ | MFVL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $62.24 | $20.20 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $62.44 | $20.26 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
COWZ | MFVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
COWZ | MFVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $62.24 | $20.20 |
| 1D performance | -0.32% | -0.32% |
| AuM | $18.18 B | $6.46 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.5% |
COWZ | MFVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Motley Fool Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index | Motley Fool Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 98 | 106 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 16, 2016 | December 8, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the COWZ and MFVL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, COWZ is up 3.77% year-to-date (YTD), while MFVL has lost -0.51%. That puts COWZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: COWZ or MFVL?
Year-to-date, the COWZ ETF saw -$479M in flows, compared to +$4M for MFVL.
Which ETF is bigger: COWZ or MFVL?
As of March 13, 2026, COWZ holds $18.18 B in assets under management (AUM), while MFVL manages $6.46 M.
What sectors do the COWZ and MFVL ETFs invest in?
COWZ leans toward sectors like Health Care, Energy and Information Technology. Meanwhile, MFVL focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the COWZ ETF and MFVL ETF?
COWZ top holdings include NEWMONT CORP, EXXON and GILEAD SCIENCES. MFVL holds in its top three: CHEVRON TEXACO, FEDEX and WALMART INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: COWZ or MFVL?
COWZ holds 100 securities with 31.62% of its assets in the top 15. MFVL has 110 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.94%.
Hiding in Plain Sight: The Case for 'Unloved' Dividend Payers in ETFs
There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow
Recap of the Most Interesting Recent ETF Filings For the NYSE
Pacer Cash Cows ETFs: Investing in Quality Stocks
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
