COMBvsGSGETF Comparison
ETF 1
COMB
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
-0.61%
VS
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust ETF (GSG) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Commodity. COMB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.75% for GSG. COMB is up 19.61% year-to-date (YTD) with +$19M in YTD flows. GSG performs better with 32.77% YTD performance, and -$344M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of COMB and GSG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
COMB vs GSG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/12/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | COMB GSG | -9.34%-10.63% | -3.44%-1.15% | +19.61%+32.77% | +29.86%+37.33% | +45.37%+61.97% | +60.72%+92.90% |
| Flows | COMB GSG | +$6M+$36M | -$9M+$62M | +$19M-$344M | +$44M-$231M | -$15M-$404M | -$33M-$1.15B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | COMB GSG | +20.47%+34.68% | +17.42%+24.32% | +14.28%+19.53% | +16.84%+22.41% |
| Max drawdown | COMB GSG | -9.40%-12.00% | -9.40%-12.00% | -11.61%-14.85% | -26.13%-28.91% |
| Max drawdown duration | COMB GSG | 25d25d | 25d25d | 239d203d | 1320d1359d |
Trading data
COMB | GSG | |
Last sale 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.21 | $30.58 |
| Previous close 06/11/2026 | $25.40 | $30.96 |
| Consolidated volume 06/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
COMB
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCOMB | GSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
COMB | GSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.21 | $30.58 |
| 1D performance | -0.75% | -1.23% |
| AuM | $146.45 M | $987.08 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
COMB | GSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | GraniteShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | S&P GSCI Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Commodities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 22, 2017 | July 10, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
COMB
Data will be available soon
GSG
Data will be available soon
Sectors
COMB
Data will be available soon
GSG
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
COMB
Data will be available soon
GSG
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
COMB
Data will be available soon
GSG
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about COMB and GSG
How have the COMB and GSG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 12, 2026, COMB is up 19.61% year-to-date (YTD), while GSG has returned 32.77%. That puts GSG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: COMB or GSG?
Year-to-date, the COMB ETF saw +$19M in flows, compared to -$344M for GSG.
Which ETF is more volatile: COMB or GSG?
Over the past year, COMB had a volatility of 17.42%, while GSG experienced 24.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: COMB or GSG?
As of June 12, 2026, COMB holds $146.45 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSG manages $987.08 M.
Advertisement
Latest news about COMB & GSG
Harbor Capital’s Commodity ETF Quietly Outperforms Bigger Rivals
September 25, 2025
GSG
Outperforming asset classes: Exploring commodity ETFs
October 21, 2022
COMB
Advertisement
Advertisement
