Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CNYAvsKBAETF Comparison
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF
iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF (KBA) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. CNYA's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, KBA's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Materials. CNYA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.79% for KBA. CNYA is up 3.39% year-to-date (YTD) with -$9M in YTD flows. KBA performs worse with 0.06% YTD performance, and -$37M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CNYA and KBA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CNYA vs KBA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CNYA KBA | +0.06%-0.03% | +6.44%+2.48% | +3.39%+0.06% | +27.91%+31.46% | +20.03%+25.91% | -3.49%-1.14% |
| Flows | CNYA KBA | -$14M-$6M | -$9M-$42M | -$9M-$37M | -$58M-$36M | -$121M-$268M | -$259M-$288M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CNYA KBA | +12.89%+13.70% | +15.73%+16.48% | +18.39%+18.20% | +19.40%+19.66% |
| Max drawdown | CNYA KBA | -3.59%-5.50% | -12.94%-11.76% | -27.37%-26.79% | -44.53%-46.36% |
| Max drawdown duration | CNYA KBA | 42d64d | 113d105d | 535d528d | 1745d1744d |
CNYA | KBA | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.35 | $30.32 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $35.52 | $30.33 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CNYA | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CNYA | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.35 | $30.32 |
| 1D performance | -0.49% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $210.44 M | $186.88 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.79% |
CNYA | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI China A Inclusion Index | MSCI China A 50 Connect Index |
| N° of holdings | 369 | 50 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 13, 2016 | March 4, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CNYA and KBA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, CNYA is up 3.39% year-to-date (YTD), while KBA has returned 0.06%. That puts CNYA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CNYA or KBA?
Year-to-date, the CNYA ETF saw -$9M in flows, compared to -$37M for KBA.
Which ETF is more volatile: CNYA or KBA?
Over the past year, CNYA had a volatility of 15.73%, while KBA experienced 16.48%.
Which ETF is bigger: CNYA or KBA?
As of March 12, 2026, CNYA holds $210.44 M in assets under management (AUM), while KBA manages $186.88 M.
What sectors do the CNYA and KBA ETFs invest in?
CNYA leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, KBA focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Materials.
What are the top holdings of the CNYA ETF and KBA ETF?
CNYA top holdings include MOUTAI, AMPEREX TECH and ZIJIN MINING. KBA holds in its top three: ZIJIN MINING, AMPEREX TECH and MOUTAI.
Which ETF is more diversified: CNYA or KBA?
CNYA holds 385 securities with 23.48% of its assets in the top 15. KBA has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.38%.
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
China's Stock Market Struggles Amid Evergrande Crisis
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
