Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CNYAvsCQQQETF Comparison
iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. CNYA's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, CQQQ's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. CNYA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.65% for CQQQ. CNYA is up 2.58% year-to-date (YTD) with -$9M in YTD flows. CQQQ performs worse with -5.33% YTD performance, and +$64M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CNYA and CQQQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CNYA vs CQQQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CNYA CQQQ | -0.44%-7.20% | +5.77%-2.51% | +2.58%-5.33% | +27.38%+5.71% | +19.08%+17.14% | -1.98%-41.20% |
| Flows | CNYA CQQQ | -$14M-$95M | -$9M-$8M | -$9M+$64M | -$58M+$1.83B | -$121M+$1.88B | -$253M+$2.15B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CNYA CQQQ | +13.02%+25.52% | +15.75%+28.59% | +18.39%+28.56% | +19.38%+32.60% |
| Max drawdown | CNYA CQQQ | -3.59%-16.62% | -12.94%-25.47% | -27.37%-40.70% | -44.53%-68.16% |
| Max drawdown duration | CNYA CQQQ | 42d60d | 113d155d | 535d682d | 1746d1821d |
CNYA | CQQQ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.35 | $49.26 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $35.52 | $49.36 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CNYA | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CNYA | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.35 | $49.26 |
| 1D performance | -0.49% | -0.20% |
| AuM | $208.77 M | $2.71 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.65% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CNYA and CQQQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, CNYA is up 2.58% year-to-date (YTD), while CQQQ has lost -5.33%. That puts CNYA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CNYA or CQQQ?
Year-to-date, the CNYA ETF saw -$9M in flows, compared to +$64M for CQQQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: CNYA or CQQQ?
Over the past year, CNYA had a volatility of 15.75%, while CQQQ experienced 28.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: CNYA or CQQQ?
As of March 13, 2026, CNYA holds $208.77 M in assets under management (AUM), while CQQQ manages $2.71 B.
What sectors do the CNYA and CQQQ ETFs invest in?
CNYA leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, CQQQ focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the CNYA ETF and CQQQ ETF?
CNYA top holdings include MOUTAI, AMPEREX TECH and ZIJIN MINING. CQQQ holds in its top three: TENCENT HOLDINGS, PINDUODUO INC ADR and BAIDU.
Which ETF is more diversified: CNYA or CQQQ?
CNYA holds 385 securities with 23.48% of its assets in the top 15. CQQQ has 157 securities and a top 15 weight of 64.06%.
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
China's Stock Market Struggles Amid Evergrande Crisis
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
