Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CNYAvsASHRETF Comparison
iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. CNYA's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, ASHR's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. CNYA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.65% for ASHR. CNYA is up 3.39% year-to-date (YTD) with -$9M in YTD flows. ASHR performs worse with 3.32% YTD performance, and -$265M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CNYA and ASHR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CNYA vs ASHR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CNYA ASHR | +0.06%+0.24% | +6.44%+6.26% | +3.39%+3.32% | +27.91%+28.40% | +20.03%+23.20% | -3.49%-7.09% |
| Flows | CNYA ASHR | -$14M-$226M | -$9M-$248M | -$9M-$265M | -$58M-$1.22B | -$121M-$990M | -$259M-$195M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CNYA ASHR | +12.89%+12.74% | +15.73%+15.72% | +18.39%+21.07% | +19.40%+20.63% |
| Max drawdown | CNYA ASHR | -3.59%-3.39% | -12.94%-12.08% | -27.37%-30.96% | -44.53%-45.61% |
| Max drawdown duration | CNYA ASHR | 42d14d | 113d97d | 535d505d | 1745d1749d |
CNYA | ASHR | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.35 | $33.53 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $35.52 | $33.60 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CNYA | ASHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CNYA | ASHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.35 | $33.53 |
| 1D performance | -0.49% | -0.21% |
| AuM | $210.44 M | $1.59 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.65% |
CNYA | ASHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | MSCI China A Inclusion Index | CSI 300 Index |
| N° of holdings | 369 | 273 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 13, 2016 | November 5, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CNYA and ASHR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, CNYA is up 3.39% year-to-date (YTD), while ASHR has returned 3.32%. That puts CNYA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CNYA or ASHR?
Year-to-date, the CNYA ETF saw -$9M in flows, compared to -$265M for ASHR.
Which ETF is more volatile: CNYA or ASHR?
Over the past year, CNYA had a volatility of 15.73%, while ASHR experienced 15.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: CNYA or ASHR?
As of March 12, 2026, CNYA holds $210.44 M in assets under management (AUM), while ASHR manages $1.59 B.
What sectors do the CNYA and ASHR ETFs invest in?
CNYA leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, ASHR focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CNYA ETF and ASHR ETF?
CNYA top holdings include MOUTAI, AMPEREX TECH and ZIJIN MINING. ASHR holds in its top three: AMPEREX TECH, MOUTAI and CN PING AN.
Which ETF is more diversified: CNYA or ASHR?
CNYA holds 385 securities with 23.48% of its assets in the top 15. ASHR has 285 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.38%.
Tap Into China's Core: Two ETFs for Domestic Stock Market Access
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
China's Stock Market Struggles Amid Evergrande Crisis
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
