CNRGvsURAETF Comparison
VS
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. CNRG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, URA's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. CNRG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.69% for URA. CNRG is down -3.69% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. URA performs worse with -12.42% YTD performance, and +$828M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CNRG and URA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CNRG vs URA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CNRG URA | -21.45%-14.59% | -13.82%-29.90% | -3.69%-12.42% | +30.27%-2.39% | +5.99%+89.72% | -7.49%+125.77% |
| Flows | CNRG URA | -$7M+$28M | +$3M-$104M | +$8M+$828M | +$14M+$1.85B | -$106M+$2.81B | -$75M+$3.90B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CNRG URA | +46.39%+44.72% | +39.64%+45.02% | +35.29%+36.48% | +34.73%+37.54% |
| Max drawdown | CNRG URA | -31.52%-34.73% | -31.52%-38.47% | -46.60%-38.47% | -59.07%-38.47% |
| Max drawdown duration | CNRG URA | 57d84d | 57d182d | 781d182d | 1645d182d |
Trading data
CNRG | URA | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $85.95 | $37.52 |
| Previous close 07/29/2026 | $88.89 | $38.95 |
| Consolidated volume 07/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CNRG | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CNRG | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $85.95 | $37.52 |
| 1D performance | -3.31% | -3.67% |
| AuM | $185.44 M | $5.20 B |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.69% |
Characteristics
CNRG | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | Global X |
| Benchmark | S&P Kensho Clean Power Index | Solactive Global Uranium Index |
| N° of holdings | 40 | 49 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 22, 2018 | November 4, 2010 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CNRG
USA
72.35%
Canada
7.74%
Other
19.91%
URA
Canada
42.07%
USA
21.88%
Republic of Korea
13.99%
Australia
9.1%
Other
12.96%
Sectors
CNRG
Industrials
48.94%
Utilities
27.6%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.65%
Other
12.81%
URA
Energy
54.35%
Industrials
24.05%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.68%
Other
13.93%
Advertisement
Diversification
CNRG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
46.7%
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.24%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CNRG
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
5.63%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.44%
Bloom Energy Corp.
3.28%
T1 Energy, Inc.
3.11%
Generac Holdings, Inc.
3.11%
Corning, Inc.
3.05%
Arcosa, Inc.
3.00%
Sunrun, Inc.
2.85%
TransAlta Corp.
2.83%
Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
2.76%
AXIA Energia SA
2.75%
Array Technologies, Inc.
2.75%
Ameresco, Inc.
2.71%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
2.71%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
2.71%
URA
Cameco Corp.
24.63%
Oklo, Inc.
6.72%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
6.14%
Uranium Energy Corp.
5.32%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
4.81%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.73%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.75%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
3.62%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
3.06%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.98%
Denison Mines Corp.
2.95%
Centrus Energy Corp.
2.87%
Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd.
2.79%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION Co., Ltd.
2.65%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
2.24%
Frequently asked questions about CNRG and URA
How have the CNRG and URA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 29, 2026, CNRG is down -3.69% year-to-date (YTD), while URA has lost -12.42%. That puts CNRG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CNRG or URA?
Year-to-date, the CNRG ETF saw +$8M in flows, compared to +$828M for URA.
Which ETF is more volatile: CNRG or URA?
Over the past year, CNRG had a volatility of 39.64%, while URA experienced 45.02%.
Which ETF is bigger: CNRG or URA?
As of July 29, 2026, CNRG holds $185.44 M in assets under management (AUM), while URA manages $5.20 B.
What sectors do the CNRG and URA ETFs invest in?
CNRG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, URA focuses on Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the CNRG ETF and URA ETF?
CNRG top holdings include FuelCell Energy, Inc., GE Vernova, Inc. and Bloom Energy Corp.. URA holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Oklo, Inc. and NexGen Energy Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: CNRG or URA?
CNRG holds 40 securities with 46.7% of its assets in the top 15. URA has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.24%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CNRG & URA
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Advertisement
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
URA
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
URA
Nuclear Energy ETFs – Ways to play the energy source
July 19, 2022
URA
Advertisement
