CLSEvsQDPLETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
-0.19%
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. CLSE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.52%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. CLSE is up 22.03% year-to-date (YTD) with +$670M in YTD flows. QDPL performs worse with 11.45% YTD performance, and +$306M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CLSE and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CLSE vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLSE QDPL | -1.55%-1.05% | -1.87%+2.69% | +22.03%+11.45% | +29.00%+13.50% | +111.52%+78.70% | n/a+71.50% |
| Flows | CLSE QDPL | +$66M+$26M | +$251M+$118M | +$670M+$306M | +$701M+$414M | +$858M+$1.37B | -+$1.52B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CLSE QDPL | +9.17%+10.07% | +13.05%+11.70% | +13.48%+13.52% | n/a+15.35% |
| Max drawdown | CLSE QDPL | -3.35%-2.82% | -4.60%-8.32% | -15.76%-17.47% | n/a-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | CLSE QDPL | 10d53d | 40d70d | 188d126d | n/a704d |
Trading data
CLSE | QDPL | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.37 | $45.67 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $33.40 | $45.88 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CLSE
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCLSE | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CLSE | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.37 | $45.67 |
| 1D performance | -0.10% | -0.46% |
| AuM | $1.02 B | $1.83 B |
| E/R | 1.52% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
CLSE | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Convergence Investment Partners LLC | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 22, 2022 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CLSE
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
CLSE
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
CLSE
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
CLSE
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about CLSE and QDPL
How have the CLSE and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, CLSE is up 22.03% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 11.45%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CLSE or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the CLSE ETF saw +$670M in flows, compared to +$306M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: CLSE or QDPL?
Over the past year, CLSE had a volatility of 13.05%, while QDPL experienced 11.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: CLSE or QDPL?
As of October 23, 2026, CLSE holds $1.02 B in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.83 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about CLSE & QDPL
Advertisement
Advertisement
