BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

CLSEvsDFACETF Comparison

ETF 1

CLSE

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF

This fund is part of

Alternatives

+0.49%

Full CLSE fund page

VS

ETF 2

DFAC

Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF

This fund is part of

US All Cap

+0.62%

Full DFAC fund page

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) belongs to the Alternatives segment. Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) is part of the US All Cap segment. CLSE's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, DFAC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. CLSE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.44%, versus 0.17% for DFAC. CLSE is up 13.25% year-to-date (YTD) with +$156M in YTD flows. DFAC performs worse with 6.71% YTD performance, and +$1.34B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CLSE and DFAC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

CLSE vs DFAC performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 04/24/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	CLSE DFAC	+8.63%+8.22%	+10.84%+3.60%	+13.25%+6.71%	+45.96%+37.58%	+110.85%+70.51%	n/a+71.90%
Flows	CLSE DFAC	+$77M+$412M	+$132M+$1.11B	+$156M+$1.34B	+$215M+$3.68B	+$343M+$10.42B	-+$16.37B

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	CLSE DFAC	+16.13%+15.15%	+12.44%+13.01%	+13.28%+15.37%	n/a+17.42%
Max drawdown	CLSE DFAC	-4.60%-8.50%	-4.60%-8.50%	-15.76%-20.02%	n/a-23.21%
Max drawdown duration	CLSE DFAC	40d64d	40d64d	188d216d	n/a707d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	CLSE	DFAC
Last sale 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM	$30.92	$42.21
Previous close 04/23/2026	$30.82	$42.00
Consolidated volume 04/23/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Main metrics

Last update 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	CLSE	DFAC
Last price	$30.92	$42.21
1D performance	+0.33%	+0.50%
AuM	$470.08 M	$44.11 B
E/R	1.44%	0.17%

Characteristics

	CLSE	DFAC
Management strategy	Active	Active
Provider	Convergence Investment Partners LLC	Dimensional
Benchmark	-	-
N° of holdings	627	2202
Asset class	-	-
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	February 22, 2022	October 4, 2007
ESG	No	No

More CLSE data on Trackinsight

More DFAC data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

CLSE

Data will be available soon

DFAC

USA

92.77%

Other

7.23%

Sectors

CLSE

Data will be available soon

DFAC

Information Techn.

26.25%

Financials

12.96%

Industrials

12.4%

Consumer Discreti.

9.97%

Health Care

9.19%

Communication Ser.

8.19%

Other

21.04%

Diversification

CLSE

Data will be available soon

DFAC

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

28.88%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of March 31, 2026

CLSE

Data will be available soon

DFAC

NVIDIA

5.35%

APPLE

4.79%

MICROSOFT-T

3.86%

AMAZON.COM INC

2.60%

ALPHABET INC-CL

2.05%

META PLATFORMS

1.89%

ALPHABET INC-CL

1.52%

EXXON

1.06%

JPMORGAN CHASE

1.02%

JOHNSON&JOHNSON

0.95%

LILLY

0.93%

BERKSHIRE HATHWAY

0.78%

BROADCOM LIMITED

0.76%

CHEVRON TEXACO

0.65%

VISA INCORPORATION

0.65%

Frequently asked questions about CLSE and DFAC

How have the CLSE and DFAC ETFs performed in 2026?

As of April 24, 2026, CLSE is up 13.25% year-to-date (YTD), while DFAC has returned 6.71%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CLSE or DFAC?

Year-to-date, the CLSE ETF saw +$156M in flows, compared to +$1.34B for DFAC.

Which ETF is more volatile: CLSE or DFAC?

Over the past year, CLSE had a volatility of 12.44%, while DFAC experienced 13.01%.

Which ETF is bigger: CLSE or DFAC?

As of April 24, 2026, CLSE holds $470.08 M in assets under management (AUM), while DFAC manages $44.11 B.

What sectors do the CLSE and DFAC ETFs invest in?

CLSE leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, DFAC focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Industrials.

CLSEvsDFACETF Comparison

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF

Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF

CLSE vs DFAC performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the CLSE and DFAC ETFs performed in 2026?

As of April 24, 2026, CLSE is up 13.25% year-to-date (YTD), while DFAC has returned 6.71%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CLSE or DFAC?

Year-to-date, the CLSE ETF saw +$156M in flows, compared to +$1.34B for DFAC.

Which ETF is more volatile: CLSE or DFAC?

Over the past year, CLSE had a volatility of 12.44%, while DFAC experienced 13.01%.

Which ETF is bigger: CLSE or DFAC?

As of April 24, 2026, CLSE holds $470.08 M in assets under management (AUM), while DFAC manages $44.11 B.

What sectors do the CLSE and DFAC ETFs invest in?

CLSE leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, DFAC focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Industrials.

What are the top holdings of the CLSE ETF and DFAC ETF?

CLSE top holdings include NVIDIA, BROADCOM LIMITED and US5128073062. DFAC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.

Which ETF is more diversified: CLSE or DFAC?

CLSE holds 673 securities with 31.42% of its assets in the top 15. DFAC has 2272 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.88%.

Active ETFs See Strong Interest with Managers like Dimensional Fund Advisors Leading the Way

The Most Popular Actively Managed ETFs of 2023

Active ETFs gaining prominence

Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution