Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CLIXvsQDPLETF Comparison
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. CLIX's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. In contrast, QDPL's top sector exposures are Information Technology and Sovereign.Communication Services, CLIX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. CLIX is down -11.86% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. QDPL performs better with -2.87% YTD performance, and +$68M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CLIX and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CLIX vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLIX QDPL | +5.39%-2.91% | -10.19%-2.41% | -11.86%-2.87% | +14.69%+19.00% | +75.48%+70.66% | -38.16%n/a |
| Flows | CLIX QDPL | -+$24M | -+$97M | -+$68M | -$3M+$485M | -$12M+$1.20B | -$151M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CLIX QDPL | +22.45%+10.78% | +22.56%+16.47% | +21.24%+13.39% | +27.11%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CLIX QDPL | -19.57%-4.65% | -19.57%-13.07% | -21.25%-17.47% | -68.50%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CLIX QDPL | 60d39d | 60d45d | 109d126d | 1822dn/a |
CLIX | QDPL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $53.22 | $40.93 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $53.06 | $41.17 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CLIX | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CLIX | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $53.22 | $40.93 |
| 1D performance | +0.30% | -0.58% |
| AuM | $6.66 M | $1.42 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.6% |
CLIX | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | 15 | 493 |
| Asset class | Alternative | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 14, 2017 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CLIX and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, CLIX is down -11.86% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has lost -2.87%. That puts QDPL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CLIX or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the CLIX ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$68M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: CLIX or QDPL?
Over the past year, CLIX had a volatility of 22.56%, while QDPL experienced 16.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: CLIX or QDPL?
As of March 13, 2026, CLIX holds $6.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.42 B.
What sectors do the CLIX and QDPL ETFs invest in?
CLIX leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QDPL focuses on Information Technology, Sovereign and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the CLIX ETF and QDPL ETF?
CLIX top holdings include AMAZON.COM INC, US01609W1027 and EBAY. QDPL holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: CLIX or QDPL?
CLIX holds 19 securities with 81.84% of its assets in the top 15. QDPL has 516 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.42%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
