CLCGvsSCHGETF Comparison
VS
Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. CLCG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, SCHG's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. CLCG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.04% for SCHG. CLCG is up 2.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. SCHG performs better with 7.12% YTD performance, and +$5.82B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CLCG and SCHG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CLCG vs SCHG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLCG SCHG | -5.10%-3.24% | -1.78%+4.31% | +2.39%+7.12% | +2.42%+8.08% | n/a+94.56% | n/a+80.48% |
| Flows | CLCG SCHG | -+$828M | +$280K+$1.57B | +$4M+$5.82B | +$8M+$6.88B | -+$20.72B | -+$24.14B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CLCG SCHG | +15.86%+15.22% | +18.00%+16.81% | n/a+19.73% | n/a+22.68% |
| Max drawdown | CLCG SCHG | -7.28%-5.74% | -16.42%-16.35% | n/a-23.41% | n/a-34.60% |
| Max drawdown duration | CLCG SCHG | 17d17d | 188d188d | n/a193d | n/a754d |
Trading data
CLCG | SCHG | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.61 | $34.82 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $27.82 | $34.94 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CLCG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCLCG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CLCG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.61 | $34.82 |
| 1D performance | -0.73% | -0.34% |
| AuM | $27.89 M | $62.53 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.04% |
Characteristics
CLCG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Crossmark Global Investment | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 34 | 187 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 23, 2025 | December 11, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CLCG
USA
96.24%
Other
3.76%
SCHG
USA
98.24%
Other
1.76%
Sectors
CLCG
Technology
62.74%
Finance
13.17%
Industrials
8.18%
Healthcare
7.8%
Other
8.12%
SCHG
Technology
56.16%
Healthcare
9.96%
Finance
8.13%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.23%
Other
18.52%
Advertisement
Diversification
CLCG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.57%
SCHG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
61.95%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
CLCG
NVIDIA Corp.
17.45%
Apple, Inc.
9.47%
Alphabet, Inc.
8.74%
Visa, Inc.
3.68%
Microsoft Corp.
3.56%
Eli Lilly & Co.
3.51%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.27%
Broadcom Inc.
3.19%
Lam Research Corp.
2.82%
Arista Networks, Inc.
2.72%
Caterpillar, Inc.
2.71%
Fortinet, Inc.
2.52%
GE Vernova, Inc.
2.40%
Airbnb, Inc.
2.29%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.22%
SCHG
NVIDIA Corp.
10.61%
Apple, Inc.
9.36%
Microsoft Corp.
7.51%
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.26%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.18%
Broadcom Inc.
3.47%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.34%
Eli Lilly & Co.
3.21%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.57%
Visa, Inc.
2.51%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.47%
Tesla, Inc.
2.31%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.91%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
1.67%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
1.57%
Frequently asked questions about CLCG and SCHG
How have the CLCG and SCHG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, CLCG is up 2.39% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHG has returned 7.12%. That puts SCHG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CLCG or SCHG?
Year-to-date, the CLCG ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$5.82B for SCHG.
Which ETF is more volatile: CLCG or SCHG?
Over the past year, CLCG had a volatility of 18%, while SCHG experienced 16.81%.
Which ETF is bigger: CLCG or SCHG?
As of October 23, 2026, CLCG holds $27.89 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCHG manages $62.53 B.
What sectors do the CLCG and SCHG ETFs invest in?
CLCG leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, SCHG focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the CLCG ETF and SCHG ETF?
CLCG top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Alphabet, Inc.. SCHG holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CLCG or SCHG?
CLCG holds 34 securities with 70.57% of its assets in the top 15. SCHG has 188 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.95%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CLCG & SCHG
Advertisement
Advertisement
