CIBRvsHACKETF Comparison
VS
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) belong to the same industry segment: Cybersecurity. CIBR's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Business Services. In contrast, HACK's top sector exposures are Technology and Industrials. CIBR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.6% for HACK. CIBR is up 37.2% year-to-date (YTD) with +$870M in YTD flows. HACK performs better with 43.65% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CIBR and HACK below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CIBR vs HACK performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CIBR HACK | +5.95%+4.86% | +21.02%+26.59% | +37.20%+43.65% | +37.09%+38.89% | +125.41%+133.71% | +107.58%+91.71% |
| Flows | CIBR HACK | +$376M+$76M | +$737M+$103M | +$870M+$3M | +$1.40B-$92M | +$3.66B-$104M | +$4.80B-$593M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CIBR HACK | +31.85%+34.45% | +26.22%+27.58% | +23.05%+23.81% | +25.29%+24.56% |
| Max drawdown | CIBR HACK | -11.75%-10.73% | -21.97%-20.50% | -21.97%-21.58% | -33.81%-38.73% |
| Max drawdown duration | CIBR HACK | 41d28d | 217d219d | 217d106d | 795d1016d |
Trading data
CIBR | HACK | |
Last sale 8/19/2026 at 7:37 PM | $95.76 | $112.91 |
| Previous close 08/18/2026 | $97.44 | $115.28 |
| Consolidated volume 08/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CIBR | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/19/2026 at 7:37 PM
Live
Closed
CIBR | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $95.76 | $112.91 |
| 1D performance | -1.72% | -2.06% |
| AuM | $15.61 B | $2.97 B |
| E/R | 0.58% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
CIBR | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index | ISE Cyber Security Select Index |
| N° of holdings | 41 | 23 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 23, 2015 | November 12, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CIBR
USA
89%
Other
11%
HACK
USA
89.52%
Other
10.48%
Sectors
CIBR
Technology
94.14%
Other
5.86%
HACK
Technology
90.06%
Industrials
9.61%
Other
0.33%
Advertisement
Diversification
CIBR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
69.25%
HACK
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.53%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CIBR
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
9.79%
Fortinet, Inc.
9.03%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
8.28%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
7.61%
Broadcom Inc.
6.48%
Cloudflare, Inc.
3.99%
Okta, Inc.
3.57%
F5, Inc.
3.43%
Zscaler, Inc.
3.11%
Rubrik, Inc.
2.69%
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
2.67%
Gen Digital, Inc.
2.21%
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
2.16%
JFrog Ltd.
2.14%
Dynatrace, Inc.
2.09%
HACK
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
6.24%
Broadcom Inc.
6.17%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
5.96%
Fortinet, Inc.
5.61%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
5.41%
General Dynamics Corp.
5.12%
Cloudflare, Inc.
4.98%
Northrop Grumman Corp.
4.49%
F5, Inc.
4.38%
Okta, Inc.
4.30%
Varonis Systems, Inc.
4.16%
Zscaler, Inc.
4.01%
Qualys, Inc.
3.94%
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
3.91%
Gen Digital, Inc.
3.85%
Frequently asked questions about CIBR and HACK
How have the CIBR and HACK ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 17, 2026, CIBR is up 37.2% year-to-date (YTD), while HACK has returned 43.65%. That puts HACK better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CIBR or HACK?
Year-to-date, the CIBR ETF saw +$870M in flows, compared to +$3M for HACK.
Which ETF is more volatile: CIBR or HACK?
Over the past year, CIBR had a volatility of 26.22%, while HACK experienced 27.58%.
Which ETF is bigger: CIBR or HACK?
As of August 17, 2026, CIBR holds $15.61 B in assets under management (AUM), while HACK manages $2.97 B.
What sectors do the CIBR and HACK ETFs invest in?
CIBR leans toward sectors like Technology. Meanwhile, HACK focuses on Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CIBR ETF and HACK ETF?
CIBR top holdings include Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.. HACK holds in its top three: Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Broadcom Inc. and Cisco Systems, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CIBR or HACK?
CIBR holds 41 securities with 69.25% of its assets in the top 15. HACK has 23 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.53%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CIBR & HACK
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
January 23, 2025
HACK
There's an ETF for That? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Cybersecurity
March 6, 2024
CIBR
HACK
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
HACK
Advertisement
Advertisement
