CIBRvsHACKETF Comparison
VS
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) belong to the same industry segment: Cybersecurity. CIBR's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Business Services. In contrast, HACK's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials CIBR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.6% for HACK. CIBR is up 27.78% year-to-date (YTD) with +$319M in YTD flows. HACK performs better with 33.28% YTD performance, and -$112M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CIBR and HACK below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CIBR vs HACK performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CIBR HACK | -3.24%+1.45% | +44.34%+38.59% | +27.78%+33.28% | +23.10%+25.98% | +103.23%+112.86% | +98.96%+77.99% |
| Flows | CIBR HACK | +$28M-$7M | +$225M-$31M | +$319M-$112M | +$1.61B-$210M | +$3.11B-$239M | +$4.49B-$677M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CIBR HACK | +33.54%+34.94% | +25.28%+26.24% | +22.70%+23.16% | +25.03%+24.11% |
| Max drawdown | CIBR HACK | -11.75%-10.73% | -21.97%-20.50% | -21.97%-21.58% | -33.81%-38.73% |
| Max drawdown duration | CIBR HACK | 29d28d | 217d219d | 217d106d | 795d1016d |
Trading data
CIBR | HACK | |
Last sale 6/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $89.64 | $106.97 |
| Previous close 07/02/2026 | $88.50 | $107.10 |
| Consolidated volume 07/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CIBR | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CIBR | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $89.64 | $106.97 |
| 1D performance | +1.29% | -0.12% |
| AuM | $14.02 B | $2.64 B |
| E/R | 0.58% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
CIBR | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index | ISE Cyber Security Select Index |
| N° of holdings | 41 | 22 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 23, 2015 | November 12, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CIBR
USA
90.94%
Other
9.06%
HACK
USA
90.2%
Other
9.8%
Sectors
CIBR
Technology
95.44%
Other
4.56%
HACK
Technology
92.74%
Industrials
7.15%
Other
0.11%
Advertisement
Diversification
CIBR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
74.27%
HACK
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
77.64%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
CIBR
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
11.05%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
10.60%
Fortinet, Inc.
8.91%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
8.02%
Broadcom Inc.
7.56%
Cloudflare, Inc.
4.13%
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
3.30%
Datadog, Inc.
3.26%
Okta, Inc.
3.20%
F5, Inc.
2.82%
Zscaler, Inc.
2.71%
NetApp, Inc.
2.38%
Gen Digital, Inc.
2.24%
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
2.07%
Rubrik, Inc.
2.02%
HACK
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
7.45%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
7.38%
Broadcom Inc.
7.34%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
6.99%
Fortinet, Inc.
6.49%
F5, Inc.
4.88%
Cloudflare, Inc.
4.81%
Zscaler, Inc.
4.31%
Okta, Inc.
4.24%
SentinelOne, Inc.
4.20%
Rubrik, Inc.
4.17%
General Dynamics Corp.
3.98%
A10 Networks, Inc.
3.94%
Varonis Systems, Inc.
3.78%
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
3.68%
Frequently asked questions about CIBR and HACK
How have the CIBR and HACK ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 1, 2026, CIBR is up 27.78% year-to-date (YTD), while HACK has returned 33.28%. That puts HACK better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CIBR or HACK?
Year-to-date, the CIBR ETF saw +$319M in flows, compared to -$112M for HACK.
Which ETF is more volatile: CIBR or HACK?
Over the past year, CIBR had a volatility of 25.28%, while HACK experienced 26.24%.
Which ETF is bigger: CIBR or HACK?
As of July 1, 2026, CIBR holds $14.02 B in assets under management (AUM), while HACK manages $2.64 B.
What sectors do the CIBR and HACK ETFs invest in?
CIBR leans toward sectors like Technology. Meanwhile, HACK focuses on Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CIBR ETF and HACK ETF?
CIBR top holdings include CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Fortinet, Inc.. HACK holds in its top three: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CIBR or HACK?
CIBR holds 41 securities with 74.27% of its assets in the top 15. HACK has 22 securities and a top 15 weight of 77.64%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CIBR & HACK
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
January 23, 2025
HACK
There's an ETF for That? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Cybersecurity
March 6, 2024
CIBR
HACK
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
HACK
Advertisement
Advertisement
