CIBRvsHACKETF Comparison
VS
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) belong to the same industry segment: Cybersecurity. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology and Industrials. CIBR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.6% for HACK. CIBR is down -9.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$113M in YTD flows. HACK performs better with -3.52% YTD performance, and -$81M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CIBR and HACK below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CIBR vs HACK performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CIBR HACK | +1.42%-0.41% | -9.00%-3.91% | -9.97%-3.52% | +0.18%+19.21% | +53.01%+64.75% | +53.18%+38.68% |
| Flows | CIBR HACK | +$36M-$12M | +$113M-$81M | +$113M-$81M | +$2.00B-$135M | +$2.80B-$275M | +$4.49B-$592M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CIBR HACK | +26.83%+27.17% | +24.42%+24.27% | +21.09%+21.45% | +24.08%+23.03% |
| Max drawdown | CIBR HACK | -17.20%-13.26% | -21.97%-20.50% | -21.97%-21.58% | -33.81%-38.73% |
| Max drawdown duration | CIBR HACK | 85d89d | 176d180d | 176d106d | 795d1016d |
Trading data
CIBR | HACK | |
Last sale 4/7/2026 at 1:30 PM | $65.25 | $78.55 |
| Previous close 04/06/2026 | $64.16 | $77.41 |
| Consolidated volume 04/06/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CIBR | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/7/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CIBR | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.25 | $78.55 |
| 1D performance | +1.70% | +1.47% |
| AuM | $9.73 B | $1.95 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
CIBR | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index | ISE Cyber Security Select Index |
| N° of holdings | 31 | 23 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 23, 2015 | November 12, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CIBR
USA
86.1%
Other
13.9%
HACK
USA
88.99%
Israel
7.34%
Other
3.67%
Sectors
CIBR
Information Techn.
76.57%
Industrials
13.62%
Other
9.81%
HACK
Information Techn.
81.96%
Industrials
13.75%
Other
4.29%
Advertisement
Diversification
CIBR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
81.32%
HACK
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
77.34%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of February 28, 2026
CIBR
CISCO-T
9.12%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS
7.87%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC
7.77%
BROADCOM LIMITED
7.16%
US4567881085
6.80%
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES
4.96%
THALES
4.96%
F5 INC
4.79%
CLOUDFLARE INC
4.75%
FORTINET
4.61%
LEIDOS HOLDINGS INC
4.07%
OKTA
3.93%
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIS
3.68%
NORTONLIFELOCK INC
3.51%
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING
3.34%
HACK
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
7.53%
BROADCOM LIMITED
7.23%
CISCO-T
7.19%
GENERAL DYNAMICS
6.22%
FASTLY INC
5.53%
F5 INC
5.33%
FORTINET
5.19%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS
4.76%
CLOUDFLARE INC
4.63%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC
4.37%
OKTA
4.15%
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIS
4.04%
NORTONLIFELOCK INC
4.00%
A10 NETWORKS
3.77%
US7811541090
3.40%
Frequently asked questions about CIBR and HACK
How have the CIBR and HACK ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 2, 2026, CIBR is down -9.97% year-to-date (YTD), while HACK has lost -3.52%. That puts HACK better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CIBR or HACK?
Year-to-date, the CIBR ETF saw +$113M in flows, compared to -$81M for HACK.
Which ETF is more volatile: CIBR or HACK?
Over the past year, CIBR had a volatility of 24.42%, while HACK experienced 24.27%.
Which ETF is bigger: CIBR or HACK?
As of April 2, 2026, CIBR holds $9.73 B in assets under management (AUM), while HACK manages $1.95 B.
What sectors do the CIBR and HACK ETFs invest in?
CIBR leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, HACK focuses on Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CIBR ETF and HACK ETF?
CIBR top holdings include CISCO-T, PALO ALTO NETWORKS and CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC. HACK holds in its top three: NORTHROP GRUMMAN, BROADCOM LIMITED and CISCO-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: CIBR or HACK?
CIBR holds 32 securities with 81.32% of its assets in the top 15. HACK has 23 securities and a top 15 weight of 77.34%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CIBR & HACK
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
January 23, 2025
HACK
There's an ETF for That? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Cybersecurity
March 6, 2024
CIBR
HACK
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
HACK
Advertisement
Advertisement
