Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CHPSvsIXNETF Comparison
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) is part of the Global Large Cap segment. CHPS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, IXN's top sector exposures are Information Technology CHPS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.39% for IXN. CHPS is up 18.6% year-to-date (YTD) with +$22M in YTD flows. IXN performs worse with -1.42% YTD performance, and -$114M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CHPS and IXN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CHPS vs IXN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CHPS IXN | -3.50%-1.77% | +16.77%+0.21% | +18.60%-1.42% | +100.74%+34.74% | n/a+114.93% | n/a+111.86% |
| Flows | CHPS IXN | +$13M+$75M | +$24M-$69M | +$22M-$114M | +$28M+$306M | -+$312M | --$1.69B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CHPS IXN | +29.37%+23.20% | +29.86%+26.64% | n/a+23.03% | n/a+24.27% |
| Max drawdown | CHPS IXN | -11.22%-7.73% | -22.03%-17.88% | n/a-25.59% | n/a-36.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | CHPS IXN | 14d43d | 46d45d | n/a124d | n/a688d |
CHPS | IXN | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 2:25 PM | $54.26 | $102.86 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $53.34 | $103.70 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CHPS | IXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CHPS | IXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.26 | $102.86 |
| 1D performance | +1.72% | -0.81% |
| AuM | $43.20 M | $6.41 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.39% |
CHPS | IXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | iShares |
| Benchmark | Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index | S&P Global 1200 Information Technology 4.5/22.5/45 Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 49 | 115 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 13, 2023 | November 12, 2001 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CHPS and IXN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CHPS is up 18.6% year-to-date (YTD), while IXN has lost -1.42%. That puts CHPS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CHPS or IXN?
Year-to-date, the CHPS ETF saw +$22M in flows, compared to -$114M for IXN.
Which ETF is more volatile: CHPS or IXN?
Over the past year, CHPS had a volatility of 29.86%, while IXN experienced 26.64%.
Which ETF is bigger: CHPS or IXN?
As of March 11, 2026, CHPS holds $43.20 M in assets under management (AUM), while IXN manages $6.41 B.
What sectors do the CHPS and IXN ETFs invest in?
CHPS leans toward sectors like Information Technology. Meanwhile, IXN focuses on Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the CHPS ETF and IXN ETF?
CHPS top holdings include MICRON TECHNOLOGY, SK HYNIX and US5128073062. IXN holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: CHPS or IXN?
CHPS holds 56 securities with 68.99% of its assets in the top 15. IXN has 122 securities and a top 15 weight of 69.8%.
Ask the Manager: Dr. Maria Milina on Artificial Intelligence and What to expect in 2026
Tech ETFs Surge, Led by Nvidia’s Outstanding Performance
Tech Sinks in First Week of August
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
