CHIQvsCNYAETF Comparison
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. In contrast, CNYA's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. CHIQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.6% for CNYA. CHIQ is down -26.84% year-to-date (YTD) with -$67M in YTD flows. CNYA performs better with -7.79% YTD performance, and -$33M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CHIQ and CNYA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CHIQ vs CNYA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CHIQ CNYA | -3.50%-6.14% | -13.02%-9.35% | -26.84%-7.79% | -32.71%-7.67% | -8.17%+27.42% | -44.70%-16.56% |
| Flows | CHIQ CNYA | -$4M-$25M | -$15M-$17M | -$67M-$33M | -$78M-$60M | -$172M-$106M | -$305M-$290M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CHIQ CNYA | +17.54%+15.60% | +20.17%+18.16% | +26.65%+19.47% | +30.68%+19.64% |
| Max drawdown | CHIQ CNYA | -17.52%-14.50% | -33.22%-19.35% | -36.42%-21.36% | -53.45%-44.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | CHIQ CNYA | 86d72d | 364d128d | 391d318d | 1807d1781d |
CHIQ | CNYA | |
Last sale 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $15.37 | $30.93 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $15.45 | $31.41 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CHIQ | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CHIQ | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $15.37 | $30.93 |
| 1D performance | -0.52% | -1.53% |
| AuM | $97.20 M | $163.40 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.6% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
