CGWvsPHOETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CGW's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, PHO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials. Both CGW and PHO have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%. CGW is up 3.73% year-to-date (YTD) with +$41M in YTD flows. PHO performs better with 8.91% YTD performance, and -$128M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGW and PHO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGW vs PHO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGW PHO | +3.82%+12.16% | -0.08%+7.25% | +3.73%+8.91% | +4.69%+7.87% | +47.09%+48.82% | +19.51%+34.33% |
| Flows | CGW PHO | -$358K-$3M | -$358K-$53M | +$41M-$128M | +$46M-$144M | -$126M-$326M | -$209M-$421M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGW PHO | +12.89%+15.39% | +13.46%+16.14% | +13.63%+16.57% | +15.80%+18.47% |
| Max drawdown | CGW PHO | -7.04%-7.48% | -10.52%-13.81% | -14.42%-19.26% | -32.65%-28.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGW PHO | 89d80d | 249d281d | 227d250d | 862d715d |
Trading data
CGW | PHO | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM | $65.28 | $76.14 |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $64.06 | $76.26 |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CGW | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
CGW | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.28 | $76.14 |
| 1D performance | +1.90% | -0.16% |
| AuM | $1.06 B | $2.12 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.59% |
Exposure
Countries
CGW
USA
55.93%
United Kingdom
14.3%
Brazil
10.44%
Other
19.34%
PHO
USA
94.6%
Other
5.4%
Sectors
CGW
Utilities
46.01%
Industrials
34.95%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.61%
Other
3.43%
PHO
Industrials
45.59%
Healthcare
19.13%
Non-Energy Materi.
16.41%
Technology
11.97%
Other
6.89%
Advertisement
Diversification
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
67.82%
PHO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.41%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
CGW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
8.09%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
7.48%
Xylem, Inc.
7.04%
United Utilities Group Plc
5.84%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.83%
Severn Trent Plc
5.25%
Veralto Corp.
4.88%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.23%
Geberit AG
3.69%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.46%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.30%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
2.44%
American States Water Co.
2.24%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.10%
California Water Service Group
1.92%
PHO
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
8.41%
Ecolab, Inc.
8.22%
Waters Corp.
7.50%
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
6.90%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
6.08%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
4.74%
Veralto Corp.
4.03%
Trimble, Inc.
3.98%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
3.87%
Xylem, Inc.
3.80%
Pentair plc
3.64%
IDEX Corp.
3.53%
AECOM
3.14%
Jacobs Solutions, Inc.
3.00%
Valmont Industries, Inc.
2.58%
Frequently asked questions about CGW and PHO
How have the CGW and PHO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, CGW is up 3.73% year-to-date (YTD), while PHO has returned 8.91%. That puts PHO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGW or PHO?
Year-to-date, the CGW ETF saw +$41M in flows, compared to -$128M for PHO.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGW or PHO?
Over the past year, CGW had a volatility of 13.46%, while PHO experienced 16.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGW or PHO?
As of November 2, 2026, CGW holds $1.06 B in assets under management (AUM), while PHO manages $2.12 B.
What sectors do the CGW and PHO ETFs invest in?
CGW leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, PHO focuses on Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the CGW ETF and PHO ETF?
CGW top holdings include American Water Works Co., Inc., Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP and Xylem, Inc.. PHO holds in its top three: Ferguson Enterprises, Inc., Ecolab, Inc. and Waters Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGW or PHO?
CGW holds 66 securities with 67.82% of its assets in the top 15. PHO has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.41%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CGW & PHO
Could Water ETFs Be the Next AI Bottleneck Trade?
September 10, 2026
CGW
PHO
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
CGW
PHO
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
February 3, 2023
PHO
Advertisement
Advertisement
