Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CGWvsPHOETF Comparison
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CGW's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Materials. In contrast, PHO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Utilities. Both CGW and PHO have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%. CGW is up 1.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$26M in YTD flows. PHO performs worse with -4.4% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGW and PHO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CGW vs PHO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGW PHO | -6.90%-7.35% | +0.45%-5.98% | +1.28%-4.40% | +16.84%+6.01% | +41.22%+33.90% | +41.68%+40.29% |
| Flows | CGW PHO | +$5M+$17M | +$26M+$5M | +$26M+$4M | -$2M-$179M | -$196M-$238M | -$85M+$10M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGW PHO | +11.88%+15.89% | +13.96%+18.49% | +13.42%+16.24% | +15.49%+18.15% |
| Max drawdown | CGW PHO | -7.31%-9.88% | -9.36%-11.61% | -15.88%-19.26% | -32.65%-28.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGW PHO | 15d50d | 35d43d | 140d250d | 862d715d |
CGW | PHO | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $63.54 | $67.27 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $63.85 | $67.15 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CGW | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CGW | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $63.54 | $67.27 |
| 1D performance | -0.49% | +0.18% |
| AuM | $1.02 B | $2.00 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.59% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CGW and PHO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, CGW is up 1.28% year-to-date (YTD), while PHO has lost -4.4%. That puts CGW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGW or PHO?
Year-to-date, the CGW ETF saw +$26M in flows, compared to +$4M for PHO.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGW or PHO?
Over the past year, CGW had a volatility of 13.96%, while PHO experienced 18.49%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGW or PHO?
As of March 13, 2026, CGW holds $1.02 B in assets under management (AUM), while PHO manages $2.00 B.
What sectors do the CGW and PHO ETFs invest in?
CGW leans toward sectors like Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, PHO focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Utilities.
What are the top holdings of the CGW ETF and PHO ETF?
CGW top holdings include COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BASICO, XYLEM and AMERICAN WATER WORKS. PHO holds in its top three: ECOLAB, US31488V1070 and WATERS.
Which ETF is more diversified: CGW or PHO?
CGW holds 62 securities with 68.4% of its assets in the top 15. PHO has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 76.33%.
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
