BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

CGWvsMOOETF Comparison

ETF 1

CGW

Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF

This fund is part of

Natural Resources

+0.32%

Full CGW fund page

VS

ETF 2

MOO

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

This fund is part of

Natural Resources

+0.32%

Full MOO fund page

Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CGW's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Materials. In contrast, MOO's top sector exposures are Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials. CGW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.55% for MOO. CGW is up 2.16% year-to-date (YTD) with +$26M in YTD flows. MOO performs better with 12.93% YTD performance, and +$492M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGW and MOO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

CGW vs MOO performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 04/29/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	CGW MOO	+2.38%-1.19%	-2.20%+1.68%	+2.16%+12.93%	+11.88%+22.32%	+36.47%+4.64%	+33.73%+0.47%
Flows	CGW MOO	-$496K+$65M	+$10M+$368M	+$26M+$492M	+$6M+$460M	-$196M+$12M	-$61M+$217M

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	CGW MOO	+14.70%+14.82%	+12.30%+13.03%	+13.60%+14.76%	+15.65%+16.41%
Max drawdown	CGW MOO	-9.88%-6.70%	-9.88%-8.31%	-15.88%-26.31%	-32.65%-39.01%
Max drawdown duration	CGW MOO	62d69d	62d134d	140d915d	862d1470d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	CGW	MOO
Last sale 4/30/2026 at 1:30 PM	$65.08	$83.85
Previous close 04/29/2026	$64.24	$81.89
Consolidated volume 04/29/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of April 29, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	CGW	MOO
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 4/30/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	CGW	MOO
Last price	$65.08	$83.85
1D performance	+1.31%	+2.39%
AuM	$1.03 B	$1.14 B
E/R	0.59%	0.55%

Characteristics

	CGW	MOO
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	Invesco	VanEck
Benchmark	S&P Global Water Index	MVIS Global Agribusiness Index
N° of holdings	60	46
Asset class	Equities	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	May 14, 2007	August 31, 2007
ESG	Yes	No

More CGW data on Trackinsight

More MOO data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

CGW

USA

58.28%

Brazil

12.68%

United Kingdom

9.99%

Other

19.05%

MOO

USA

49.59%

Germany

8.79%

Norway

8%

Other

33.62%

Sectors

CGW

Utilities

46.97%

Industrials

37.72%

Other

15.31%

MOO

Consumer Staples

33.16%

Materials

25.92%

Industrials

19.18%

Health Care

17.03%

Other

4.7%

Diversification

CGW

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

68.83%

MOO

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

72.32%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of March 31, 2026

CGW

COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BASICO

9.69%

AMERICAN WATER WORKS

8.77%

XYLEM

6.87%

ESSENTIAL UTILITIES INC

6.06%

US92338C1036

5.18%

UNITED UTILITIES GROUP

4.76%

ECOLAB

3.96%

SEVERN TRENT

3.94%

ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

3.51%

GEBERIT

3.41%

WTTS WTER TECH

2.91%

PENTAIR PLC

2.57%

CORE & MAIN

2.55%

ZURN WATER SOLUTIONS CORP

2.45%

AMERICAN STATES WATER

2.19%

MOO

BAYER AG

7.77%

DEERE

7.53%

CORTEVA INC

6.90%

ZOETIS INC

6.85%

NUTRIEN LTD

5.83%

ARCHER DANIELS

5.61%

CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS

5.53%

TYSON FOODS

4.83%

CH1300646267

3.89%

KUBOTA

3.80%

MOWI ASA

3.09%

WILMAR INTERNATIONAL

3.09%

YARA INTL

2.88%

DARLING INGREDIENTS INC

2.54%

TORO

2.19%

Frequently asked questions about CGW and MOO

How have the CGW and MOO ETFs performed in 2026?

As of April 29, 2026, CGW is up 2.16% year-to-date (YTD), while MOO has returned 12.93%. That puts MOO better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGW or MOO?

Year-to-date, the CGW ETF saw +$26M in flows, compared to +$492M for MOO.

Which ETF is more volatile: CGW or MOO?

Over the past year, CGW had a volatility of 12.3%, while MOO experienced 13.03%.

Which ETF is bigger: CGW or MOO?

As of April 29, 2026, CGW holds $1.03 B in assets under management (AUM), while MOO manages $1.14 B.

What sectors do the CGW and MOO ETFs invest in?

CGW leans toward sectors like Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, MOO focuses on Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials.

What are the top holdings of the CGW ETF and MOO ETF?

CGW top holdings include COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BASICO, AMERICAN WATER WORKS and XYLEM. MOO holds in its top three: BAYER AG, DEERE and CORTEVA INC.

Which ETF is more diversified: CGW or MOO?

CGW holds 62 securities with 68.83% of its assets in the top 15. MOO has 47 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.32%.

There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water

January 17, 2024

CGW

Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs

December 18, 2023

MOO

CGWvsMOOETF Comparison

Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

CGW vs MOO performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the CGW and MOO ETFs performed in 2026?

As of April 29, 2026, CGW is up 2.16% year-to-date (YTD), while MOO has returned 12.93%. That puts MOO better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGW or MOO?

Year-to-date, the CGW ETF saw +$26M in flows, compared to +$492M for MOO.

Which ETF is more volatile: CGW or MOO?

Over the past year, CGW had a volatility of 12.3%, while MOO experienced 13.03%.

Which ETF is bigger: CGW or MOO?

As of April 29, 2026, CGW holds $1.03 B in assets under management (AUM), while MOO manages $1.14 B.

What sectors do the CGW and MOO ETFs invest in?

CGW leans toward sectors like Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, MOO focuses on Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials.

What are the top holdings of the CGW ETF and MOO ETF?

CGW top holdings include COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BASICO, AMERICAN WATER WORKS and XYLEM. MOO holds in its top three: BAYER AG, DEERE and CORTEVA INC.

Which ETF is more diversified: CGW or MOO?

CGW holds 62 securities with 68.83% of its assets in the top 15. MOO has 47 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.32%.

There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water

Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs

Build and Analyze Your ETF Portfolio Like a Pro