Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CGWvsEFRAETF Comparison
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) belongs to the Natural Resources segment. iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) is part of the Infrastructure segment. CGW's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Materials. In contrast, EFRA's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. CGW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.47% for EFRA. CGW is up 1.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$26M in YTD flows. EFRA performs better with 3.22% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGW and EFRA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CGW vs EFRA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGW EFRA | -6.90%-7.39% | +0.45%+2.83% | +1.28%+3.22% | +16.84%+19.56% | +41.22%+43.19% | +41.68%n/a |
| Flows | CGW EFRA | +$5M- | +$26M- | +$26M- | -$2M- | -$196M- | -$85M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGW EFRA | +11.88%+14.00% | +13.96%+15.21% | +13.42%+14.18% | +15.49%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CGW EFRA | -7.31%-8.40% | -9.36%-10.50% | -15.88%-16.05% | -32.65%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CGW EFRA | 15d12d | 35d35d | 140d238d | 862dn/a |
CGW | EFRA | |
Last sale 3/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $63.95 | $34.49 |
| Previous close 03/13/2026 | $63.54 | $34.26 |
| Consolidated volume 03/13/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CGW | EFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CGW | EFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $63.95 | $34.49 |
| 1D performance | +0.65% | +0.68% |
| AuM | $1.02 B | $5.49 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.47% |
CGW | EFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | iShares |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Water Index | FTSE Green Revenues Select Infrastructure and Industrials Index |
| N° of holdings | 60 | 70 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 14, 2007 | November 1, 2022 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CGW and EFRA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, CGW is up 1.28% year-to-date (YTD), while EFRA has returned 3.22%. That puts EFRA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGW or EFRA?
Year-to-date, the CGW ETF saw +$26M in flows, compared to - for EFRA.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGW or EFRA?
Over the past year, CGW had a volatility of 13.96%, while EFRA experienced 15.21%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGW or EFRA?
As of March 13, 2026, CGW holds $1.02 B in assets under management (AUM), while EFRA manages $5.49 M.
What sectors do the CGW and EFRA ETFs invest in?
CGW leans toward sectors like Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, EFRA focuses on Industrials and Utilities.
What are the top holdings of the CGW ETF and EFRA ETF?
CGW top holdings include COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BASICO, XYLEM and AMERICAN WATER WORKS. EFRA holds in its top three: IE00028FXN24, VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT VE and WABTEC.
Which ETF is more diversified: CGW or EFRA?
CGW holds 62 securities with 68.4% of its assets in the top 15. EFRA has 72 securities and a top 15 weight of 65.64%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.