CGMSvsILSETF Comparison
VS
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS) belongs to the Intl Aggregate Bonds segment. Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) is part of the Intl HY Bonds segment. CGMS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Energy and Technology. In contrast, ILS's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Sovereign. CGMS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 1.58% for ILS. CGMS is up 1.03% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.66B in YTD flows. ILS performs better with 6.79% YTD performance, and +$73M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGMS and ILS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGMS vs ILS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/22/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGMS ILS | -0.63%+1.61% | -0.38%+4.16% | +1.03%+6.79% | +2.04%+9.04% | +24.66%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | CGMS ILS | +$40M+$20M | +$388M+$31M | +$1.66B+$73M | +$2.26B+$96M | +$5.33B- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGMS ILS | +2.86%+1.29% | +2.96%+0.96% | +3.58%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | CGMS ILS | -1.33%n/a | -2.28%-0.17% | -3.76%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CGMS ILS | 28dn/a | 49d8d | 92dn/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
CGMS | ILS | |
Last sale 9/23/2026 at 6:08 PM | $26.67 | |
| Previous close 09/22/2026 | $26.87 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/23/2026 at 6:08 PM
Live
Closed
CGMS | ILS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.67 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.76% | – |
| AuM | $5.44 B | $110.36 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 1.58% |
Characteristics
CGMS | ILS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Capital Group | Brookmont Capital Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 971 | 101 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 25, 2022 | March 31, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
CGMS
USA
72.38%
Other
27.62%
ILS
USA
68.09%
Other
31.91%
Sectors
CGMS
Finance
24.28%
Energy
7.26%
Technology
7.04%
Other
61.42%
ILS
Finance
52.21%
Industrials
19.44%
Other
28.35%
Advertisement
Diversification
CGMS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
9.16%
ILS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.37%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CGMS
Capital Group Central Cash Fund
3.72%
RD Michigan Property Owner I, 7.5% 30mar2045, USD
0.60%
JP Morgan, 5.803% 23jul2041, USD
0.50%
Bank of America Corporation, 5.045% 6feb2037, USD (N)
0.45%
US01F0606917
0.43%
Meta Platforms, 4.45% 15aug2052, USD
0.38%
Connect Finco SARL, 9% 15sep2029, USD
0.37%
MPT Operating Partnership, 8.5% 15feb2032, USD
0.37%
Goldman Sachs, 4.939% 21oct2036, USD
0.35%
Cloud Software Group, 9% 30sep2029, USD
0.34%
Jefferies Financial Group, 5.5% 15feb2036, USD
0.34%
USA, Notes 4.125% 30jun2031, USD (AA-2031)
0.33%
Navient, 5.625% 1aug2033, USD (A)
0.33%
MARS, 5.2% 1mar2035, USD
0.33%
Compass Group Diversified Holdings, 5.25% 15apr2029, USD
0.32%
ILS
USA, Bills 0% 29sep2026, USD (119D)
4.26%
Floodsmart Re, FRN 12mar2027, USD (2024-1, A)
2.84%
2001 Cat Re, FRN 8jan2031, USD (2023-1)
2.65%
US45870GAF37
1.90%
Atlas Capital, FRN 7jun2028, USD (1)
1.87%
Buttonwood Re, FRN 29may2029, USD (2026-1, A)
1.85%
Beazley, FRN 6apr2032, USD (Fuchsia 2023-1)
1.61%
Yosemite Re, FRN 7jun2028, USD (2025-1, A)
1.59%
US092168AB93
1.58%
Logistics Re, FRN 21dec2027, USD (2024-1)
1.56%
US574591AA15
1.56%
Montoya Re, FRN 7apr2028, USD (B)
1.55%
Four Lakes Re, FRN 7jan2027, USD (2023-1, B)
1.53%
US45870GAH92
1.52%
Sanders Re III, FRN 7apr2028, USD (2024-1, A)
1.49%
Frequently asked questions about CGMS and ILS
How have the CGMS and ILS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 22, 2026, CGMS is up 1.03% year-to-date (YTD), while ILS has returned 6.79%. That puts ILS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGMS or ILS?
Year-to-date, the CGMS ETF saw +$1.66B in flows, compared to +$73M for ILS.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGMS or ILS?
Over the past year, CGMS had a volatility of 2.96%, while ILS experienced 0.96%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGMS or ILS?
As of September 22, 2026, CGMS holds $5.44 B in assets under management (AUM), while ILS manages $110.36 M.
What sectors do the CGMS and ILS ETFs invest in?
CGMS leans toward sectors like Finance, Energy and Technology. Meanwhile, ILS focuses on Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CGMS ETF and ILS ETF?
CGMS top holdings include Capital Group Central Cash Fund, RD Michigan Property Owner I, 7.5% 30mar2045, USD and JP Morgan, 5.803% 23jul2041, USD. ILS holds in its top three: USA, Bills 0% 29sep2026, USD (119D), Floodsmart Re, FRN 12mar2027, USD (2024-1, A) and 2001 Cat Re, FRN 8jan2031, USD (2023-1).
Which ETF is more diversified: CGMS or ILS?
CGMS holds 1304 securities with 9.16% of its assets in the top 15. ILS has 128 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.37%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CGMS & ILS
The ETF Underdogs, Part 10: Tail-Risk Selling Strategies
July 15, 2026
ILS
The Super El Niño Trade: Two Potential ETF Winners and Losers
June 10, 2026
ILS
Advertisement
