CGMSvsILSETF Comparison
VS
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS) belongs to the Intl Aggregate Bonds segment. Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) is part of the Intl HY Bonds segment. CGMS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Energy. In contrast, ILS's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Sovereign. CGMS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 1.58% for ILS. CGMS is up 0.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.91B in YTD flows. ILS performs better with 8.35% YTD performance, and +$126M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGMS and ILS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGMS vs ILS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/05/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGMS ILS | +1.46%+0.84% | -1.08%+4.38% | +0.64%+8.35% | +2.00%+9.19% | +23.83%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | CGMS ILS | +$163M+$47M | +$346M+$78M | +$1.91B+$126M | +$2.29B+$145M | +$5.56B- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGMS ILS | +3.35%+1.32% | +3.13%+0.98% | +3.41%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | CGMS ILS | -2.81%n/a | -2.81%-0.17% | -3.76%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CGMS ILS | 72dn/a | 72d8d | 92dn/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
CGMS | ILS | |
Last sale 11/6/2026 at 2:30 PM | $26.50 | |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $26.53 | |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/6/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
CGMS | ILS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.50 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.11% | – |
| AuM | $5.63 B | $162.57 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 1.58% |
Characteristics
CGMS | ILS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Capital Group | Brookmont Capital Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 891 | 108 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 25, 2022 | March 31, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CGMS
USA
65.15%
Other
34.85%
ILS
USA
61.94%
Other
38.06%
Sectors
CGMS
Finance
21.2%
Other
78.8%
ILS
Finance
51.96%
Industrials
14.46%
Other
33.58%
Advertisement
Diversification
CGMS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
9.72%
ILS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.24%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
CGMS
Capital Group Central Cash Fund
3.35%
USA, Bonds 5% 15may2046, USD
0.94%
RD Michigan Property Owner I, 7.5% 30mar2045, USD
0.58%
US09629LBC81
0.55%
JP Morgan, 5.803% 23jul2041, USD
0.52%
US871044BF95
0.43%
US14315RBQ39
0.42%
Meta Platforms, 4.45% 15aug2052, USD
0.41%
Bank of America Corporation, 5.045% 6feb2037, USD (N)
0.39%
Connect Finco SARL, 9% 15sep2029, USD
0.37%
Cloud Software Group, 9% 30sep2029, USD
0.37%
US05351KAW99
0.36%
MPT Operating Partnership, 8.5% 15feb2032, USD
0.35%
Charter Communications Operating, 3.7% 1apr2051, USD
0.34%
Navient, 5.625% 1aug2033, USD (A)
0.34%
ILS
US91282CRP85
9.63%
USA, Bills 0% 27nov2026, USD (364D)
3.49%
3264 RE, FRN 9feb2032, USD (2025-1, A)
2.42%
Floodsmart Re, FRN 12mar2027, USD (2024-1, A)
2.08%
2001 Cat Re, FRN 8jan2031, USD (2023-1)
1.93%
Citrus Re, FRN 7jun2029, USD (2026-1, B)
1.83%
Corebridge Financial, 6.875% 15dec2052, USD
1.76%
Sanders Re II, FRN 7apr2029, USD (2024B)
1.62%
US45870GAF37
1.50%
Atlas Capital, FRN 7jun2028, USD (1)
1.39%
Buttonwood Re, FRN 29may2029, USD (2026-1, A)
1.36%
Essent Group, 6.25% 1jul2029, USD
1.33%
Enact Holdings, 6.25% 28may2029, USD
1.33%
US46849LVM08
1.30%
Enstar Group, 4.95% 1jun2029, USD
1.28%
Frequently asked questions about CGMS and ILS
How have the CGMS and ILS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 5, 2026, CGMS is up 0.64% year-to-date (YTD), while ILS has returned 8.35%. That puts ILS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGMS or ILS?
Year-to-date, the CGMS ETF saw +$1.91B in flows, compared to +$126M for ILS.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGMS or ILS?
Over the past year, CGMS had a volatility of 3.13%, while ILS experienced 0.98%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGMS or ILS?
As of November 5, 2026, CGMS holds $5.63 B in assets under management (AUM), while ILS manages $162.57 M.
What sectors do the CGMS and ILS ETFs invest in?
CGMS leans toward sectors like Finance. Meanwhile, ILS focuses on Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CGMS ETF and ILS ETF?
CGMS top holdings include Capital Group Central Cash Fund, USA, Bonds 5% 15may2046, USD and RD Michigan Property Owner I, 7.5% 30mar2045, USD. ILS holds in its top three: US91282CRP85, USA, Bills 0% 27nov2026, USD (364D) and 3264 RE, FRN 9feb2032, USD (2025-1, A).
Which ETF is more diversified: CGMS or ILS?
CGMS holds 1372 securities with 9.72% of its assets in the top 15. ILS has 140 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.24%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CGMS & ILS
Advertisement
