CDXvsQDPLETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
-0.73%
Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. CDX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. CDX is down -3.39% year-to-date (YTD) with -$105M in YTD flows. QDPL performs better with 12.06% YTD performance, and +$300M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CDX and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CDX vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CDX QDPL | +0.02%+1.34% | -1.14%+1.65% | -3.39%+12.06% | -3.40%+15.84% | +20.71%+73.85% | n/a+75.18% |
| Flows | CDX QDPL | -$26M+$35M | -$57M+$119M | -$105M+$300M | -$40M+$420M | +$320M+$1.37B | -+$1.52B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CDX QDPL | +3.79%+10.24% | +4.27%+11.68% | +4.90%+13.54% | n/a+15.34% |
| Max drawdown | CDX QDPL | -2.24%-2.82% | -4.73%-8.32% | -4.73%-17.47% | n/a-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | CDX QDPL | 64d53d | 339d70d | 339d126d | n/a704d |
Trading data
CDX | QDPL | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.17 | $45.95 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $20.24 | $46.38 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CDX
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCDX | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CDX | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.17 | $45.95 |
| 1D performance | -0.35% | -0.93% |
| AuM | $316.79 M | $1.83 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
CDX | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Simplify | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 14, 2022 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CDX
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
CDX
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Diversification
CDX
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
CDX
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about CDX and QDPL
How have the CDX and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, CDX is down -3.39% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 12.06%. That puts QDPL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CDX or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the CDX ETF saw -$105M in flows, compared to +$300M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: CDX or QDPL?
Over the past year, CDX had a volatility of 4.27%, while QDPL experienced 11.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: CDX or QDPL?
As of October 16, 2026, CDX holds $316.79 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.83 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about CDX & QDPL
Advertisement
