CCNRvsCGWETF Comparison
VS
ALPS CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CCNR's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. In contrast, CGW's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. CCNR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.59% for CGW. CCNR is up 17.93% year-to-date (YTD) with +$46M in YTD flows. CGW performs worse with 1.7% YTD performance, and +$41M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CCNR and CGW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CCNR vs CGW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/19/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CCNR CGW | -3.52%+0.74% | +3.62%-1.56% | +17.93%+1.70% | +27.22%-0.71% | n/a+47.94% | n/a+21.08% |
| Flows | CCNR CGW | +$11K-$358K | +$6M-$358K | +$46M+$41M | -$27M+$46M | --$130M | --$200M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CCNR CGW | +14.43%+11.81% | +15.95%+13.06% | n/a+13.58% | n/a+15.74% |
| Max drawdown | CCNR CGW | -10.04%-7.04% | -12.80%-10.52% | n/a-14.42% | n/a-32.65% |
| Max drawdown duration | CCNR CGW | 40d75d | 99d235d | n/a227d | n/a862d |
Trading data
CCNR | CGW | |
Last sale 10/20/2026 at 3:49 PM | $38.52 | $64.56 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $38.59 | $63.74 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CCNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCCNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/20/2026 at 3:49 PM
Live
Closed
CCNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.52 | $64.56 |
| 1D performance | -0.17% | +1.28% |
| AuM | $438.63 M | $1.04 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.59% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CCNR
USA
29.68%
Canada
19.44%
Australia
11.97%
Japan
8%
Other
30.92%
CGW
USA
56.47%
United Kingdom
14.4%
Brazil
9.59%
Switzerland
7.03%
Other
12.51%
Sectors
CCNR
Non-Energy Materi.
41.26%
Energy
33.38%
Industrials
7.57%
Utilities
7.47%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.33%
Other
2.99%
CGW
Utilities
45.36%
Industrials
35.72%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.65%
Other
3.28%
Advertisement
Diversification
CCNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
14.84%
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
67.56%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
CCNR
Nutrien Ltd.
1.41%
Boliden AB
1.22%
Yara International ASA
1.14%
Equinor ASA
0.99%
Murphy Oil Corp.
0.98%
Baytex Energy Corp.
0.98%
Endeavour Mining Plc
0.96%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.94%
Corteva, Inc.
0.93%
Saipem SpA
0.92%
Regis Resources Ltd.
0.92%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
0.89%
EOG Resources, Inc.
0.86%
Chord Energy Corp.
0.86%
Eni SpA
0.84%
CGW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
8.20%
Xylem, Inc.
7.51%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
6.77%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.80%
United Utilities Group Plc
5.75%
Severn Trent Plc
5.19%
Veralto Corp.
4.77%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.12%
Geberit AG
3.81%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.44%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.35%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
2.42%
American States Water Co.
2.34%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.08%
California Water Service Group
2.02%
Frequently asked questions about CCNR and CGW
How have the CCNR and CGW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 19, 2026, CCNR is up 17.93% year-to-date (YTD), while CGW has returned 1.7%. That puts CCNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CCNR or CGW?
Year-to-date, the CCNR ETF saw +$46M in flows, compared to +$41M for CGW.
Which ETF is more volatile: CCNR or CGW?
Over the past year, CCNR had a volatility of 15.95%, while CGW experienced 13.06%.
Which ETF is bigger: CCNR or CGW?
As of October 19, 2026, CCNR holds $438.63 M in assets under management (AUM), while CGW manages $1.04 B.
What sectors do the CCNR and CGW ETFs invest in?
CCNR leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, CGW focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the CCNR ETF and CGW ETF?
CCNR top holdings include Nutrien Ltd., Boliden AB and Yara International ASA. CGW holds in its top three: American Water Works Co., Inc., Xylem, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP.
Which ETF is more diversified: CCNR or CGW?
CCNR holds 302 securities with 14.84% of its assets in the top 15. CGW has 66 securities and a top 15 weight of 67.56%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CCNR & CGW
Could Water ETFs Be the Next AI Bottleneck Trade?
September 10, 2026
CGW
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
CGW
Advertisement
Advertisement
