CBLSvsLQDHETF Comparison
VS
Clough Hedged Equity ETF (CBLS) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. CBLS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.89%, versus 0.44% for LQDH. CBLS is up 10.45% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. LQDH performs worse with 3.7% YTD performance, and +$32M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CBLS and LQDH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CBLS vs LQDH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CBLS LQDH | -1.94%+0.50% | +0.19%+1.82% | +10.45%+3.70% | +8.39%+4.61% | +64.63%+23.90% | +18.50%+29.70% |
| Flows | CBLS LQDH | -$598K+$23M | -$1M+$79M | +$7M+$32M | +$10M+$92M | +$38M+$350M | +$39M-$33M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CBLS LQDH | +18.61%+2.05% | +18.55%+2.56% | +15.76%+3.30% | +16.30%+4.31% |
| Max drawdown | CBLS LQDH | -9.39%-0.60% | -14.69%-2.26% | -14.82%-4.48% | -31.24%-6.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | CBLS LQDH | 22d35d | 146d82d | 154d104d | 1150d437d |
Trading data
CBLS | LQDH | |
Last sale 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.30 | $92.35 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $30.36 | $92.70 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CBLS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCBLS | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CBLS | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.30 | $92.35 |
| 1D performance | -0.19% | -0.38% |
| AuM | $54.66 M | $606.56 M |
| E/R | 1.89% | 0.44% |
Characteristics
CBLS | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Clough Capital | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 13, 2020 | May 27, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CBLS
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Sectors
CBLS
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
CBLS
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
CBLS
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about CBLS and LQDH
How have the CBLS and LQDH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 28, 2026, CBLS is up 10.45% year-to-date (YTD), while LQDH has returned 3.7%. That puts CBLS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CBLS or LQDH?
Year-to-date, the CBLS ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to +$32M for LQDH.
Which ETF is more volatile: CBLS or LQDH?
Over the past year, CBLS had a volatility of 18.55%, while LQDH experienced 2.56%.
Which ETF is bigger: CBLS or LQDH?
As of October 28, 2026, CBLS holds $54.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while LQDH manages $606.56 M.
Advertisement
Latest news about CBLS & LQDH
Ask the Manager: Vince Lorusso on Active Equity in an AI-Driven Market
April 23, 2026
CBLS
Advertisement
Advertisement
