Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CARKvsSCHGETF Comparison
CastleArk Large Growth ETF (CARK) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. CARK is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.54%, versus 0.04% for SCHG. CARK is down -3.66% year-to-date (YTD) with -$31M in YTD flows. SCHG performs worse with -8.3% YTD performance, and +$836M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CARK and SCHG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CARK vs SCHG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CARK SCHG | -1.76%-1.74% | -4.32%-7.48% | -3.66%-8.30% | +20.63%+20.60% | n/a+103.65% | n/a+87.63% |
| Flows | CARK SCHG | -$31M+$178M | -$31M+$1.21B | -$31M+$836M | -$73M+$7.42B | -+$16.61B | -+$19.79B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CARK SCHG | +17.19%+15.51% | +22.69%+23.03% | n/a+19.57% | n/a+22.47% |
| Max drawdown | CARK SCHG | -7.19%-9.66% | -15.20%-15.72% | n/a-23.41% | n/a-34.60% |
| Max drawdown duration | CARK SCHG | 63d78d | 45d45d | n/a193d | n/a754d |
CARK | SCHG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.14 | $29.91 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $41.64 | $30.24 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CARK | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CARK | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.14 | $29.91 |
| 1D performance | -1.21% | -1.09% |
| AuM | $269.79 M | $49.29 B |
| E/R | 0.54% | 0.04% |
CARK | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | CastleArk Management | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 28 | 169 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 6, 2023 | December 11, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CARK and SCHG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CARK is down -3.66% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHG has lost -8.3%. That puts CARK better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CARK or SCHG?
Year-to-date, the CARK ETF saw -$31M in flows, compared to +$836M for SCHG.
Which ETF is more volatile: CARK or SCHG?
Over the past year, CARK had a volatility of 22.69%, while SCHG experienced 23.03%.
Which ETF is bigger: CARK or SCHG?
As of March 11, 2026, CARK holds $269.79 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCHG manages $49.29 B.
What sectors do the CARK and SCHG ETFs invest in?
CARK leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, SCHG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the CARK ETF and SCHG ETF?
CARK top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and MICROSOFT-T. SCHG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: CARK or SCHG?
CARK holds 29 securities with 78.18% of its assets in the top 15. SCHG has 189 securities and a top 15 weight of 67.64%.
ETF Comparison: Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) Versus Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV)
Will 2024 be the Year of Small Caps and Value Stocks?
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
