Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CARKvsIWFETF Comparison
CastleArk Large Growth ETF (CARK) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. CARK's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, IWF's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. CARK is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.54%, versus 0.18% for IWF. CARK is down -3.61% year-to-date (YTD) with -$31M in YTD flows. IWF performs worse with -4.6% YTD performance, and -$3.40B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CARK and IWF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CARK vs IWF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CARK IWF | -1.67%-1.42% | -4.27%-5.65% | -3.61%-4.60% | +20.72%+24.77% | n/a+103.62% | n/a+92.00% |
| Flows | CARK IWF | -$31M+$648M | -$31M-$2.01B | -$31M-$3.40B | -$73M-$1.57B | --$469M | --$1.22B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CARK IWF | +17.20%+15.76% | +22.69%+22.60% | n/a+19.04% | n/a+21.41% |
| Max drawdown | CARK IWF | -7.19%-7.14% | -15.20%-15.75% | n/a-23.36% | n/a-32.75% |
| Max drawdown duration | CARK IWF | 62d76d | 45d45d | n/a191d | n/a743d |
CARK | IWF | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:46 PM | $42.42 | $444.18 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $42.40 | $451.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CARK | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CARK | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.42 | $444.18 |
| 1D performance | +0.05% | -1.58% |
| AuM | $269.92 M | $116.99 B |
| E/R | 0.54% | 0.18% |
CARK | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | CastleArk Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 28 | 349 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 6, 2023 | May 22, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CARK and IWF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, CARK is down -3.61% year-to-date (YTD), while IWF has lost -4.6%. That puts CARK better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CARK or IWF?
Year-to-date, the CARK ETF saw -$31M in flows, compared to -$3.40B for IWF.
Which ETF is more volatile: CARK or IWF?
Over the past year, CARK had a volatility of 22.69%, while IWF experienced 22.6%.
Which ETF is bigger: CARK or IWF?
As of March 10, 2026, CARK holds $269.92 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWF manages $116.99 B.
What sectors do the CARK and IWF ETFs invest in?
CARK leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IWF focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the CARK ETF and IWF ETF?
CARK top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and MICROSOFT-T. IWF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: CARK or IWF?
CARK holds 29 securities with 78.18% of its assets in the top 15. IWF has 391 securities and a top 15 weight of 66.22%.
Will 2024 be the Year of Small Caps and Value Stocks?
Top 3 growth ETFs of 2022
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
