Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CANCvsOZEMETF Comparison
Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) and Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) belong to the same industry segment: Tomorrow's Treatments. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Health Care. CANC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.59% for OZEM. CANC is up 4.1% year-to-date (YTD) with +$41M in YTD flows. OZEM performs worse with -7.16% YTD performance, and +$16M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CANC and OZEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CANC vs OZEM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CANC OZEM | -0.94%-10.89% | +4.18%-7.23% | +4.10%-7.16% | +43.76%+31.31% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | CANC OZEM | +$12M+$3M | +$49M+$16M | +$41M+$16M | +$63M+$10M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CANC OZEM | +23.29%+22.47% | +25.13%+25.49% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | CANC OZEM | -4.68%-14.23% | -17.26%-15.51% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CANC OZEM | 16d45d | 80d42d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
CANC | OZEM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.99 | $31.33 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $36.33 | $31.59 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
CANC | OZEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.99 | $31.33 |
| 1D performance | -0.95% | -0.80% |
| AuM | $161.18 M | $55.72 M |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.59% |
CANC | OZEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Tema | Roundhill Investments |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 46 | 20 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 15, 2023 | May 21, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CANC and OZEM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, CANC is up 4.1% year-to-date (YTD), while OZEM has lost -7.16%. That puts CANC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CANC or OZEM?
Year-to-date, the CANC ETF saw +$41M in flows, compared to +$16M for OZEM.
Which ETF is more volatile: CANC or OZEM?
Over the past year, CANC had a volatility of 25.13%, while OZEM experienced 25.49%.
Which ETF is bigger: CANC or OZEM?
As of March 12, 2026, CANC holds $161.18 M in assets under management (AUM), while OZEM manages $55.72 M.
What sectors do the CANC and OZEM ETFs invest in?
CANC leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, OZEM focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the CANC ETF and OZEM ETF?
CANC top holdings include REVOLUTION MEDICINES INC, BRIDGEBIO PHARMA and NOVARTIS. OZEM holds in its top three: US6701002056, LILLY and US86366E1064.
Which ETF is more diversified: CANC or OZEM?
CANC holds 56 securities with 56.2% of its assets in the top 15. OZEM has 24 securities and a top 15 weight of 84.13%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
