BUSAvsOAKMETF Comparison
Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) and Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Value. BUSA's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Financials and Industrials. In contrast, OAKM's top sector exposures are Financials, Energy and Health Care. BUSA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.64% for OAKM. BUSA is up 6.17% year-to-date (YTD) with -$8M in YTD flows. OAKM performs worse with -1.82% YTD performance, and +$137M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BUSA and OAKM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BUSA vs OAKM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BUSA OAKM | +0.98%-0.74% | -1.11%-3.86% | +6.17%-1.82% | +23.85%+15.88% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | BUSA OAKM | -$777K-$19M | -$17M-$51M | -$8M+$137M | +$19M+$509M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BUSA OAKM | +12.92%+13.11% | +12.23%+13.58% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BUSA OAKM | -7.12%-6.74% | -7.45%-7.12% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BUSA OAKM | 86d88d | 89d120d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
BUSA | OAKM | |
Last sale 5/11/2026 at 7:59 PM | $38.41 | $27.67 |
| Previous close 05/11/2026 | $38.63 | $27.55 |
| Consolidated volume 05/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
BUSA | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.41 | $27.67 |
| 1D performance | -0.57% | +0.44% |
| AuM | $289.70 M | $1.05 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.64% |
BUSA | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Brandes | Oakmark Funds |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 61 | 36 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 3, 2023 | December 2, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15