Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BULvsTSCMETF Comparison
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) belongs to the US Large Cap Growth segment. TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. BUL's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Industrials. In contrast, TSCM's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. BUL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.55% for TSCM. BUL is down -1.65% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. TSCM performs worse with -5.49% YTD performance, and +$38M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BUL and TSCM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BUL vs TSCM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BUL TSCM | -4.06%+0.13% | -2.18%n/a | -1.65%-5.49% | +26.27%n/a | +66.16%n/a | +60.73%n/a |
| Flows | BUL TSCM | +$6K+$11M | +$16M- | +$8M+$38M | +$30M- | +$51M- | +$94M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BUL TSCM | +15.13%n/a | +23.13%n/a | +19.34%n/a | +21.74%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BUL TSCM | -5.89%n/a | -15.97%n/a | -23.19%n/a | -27.24%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BUL TSCM | 15dn/a | 44dn/a | 210dn/a | 855dn/a |
BUL | TSCM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.24 | $18.16 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $54.43 | $18.27 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BUL | TSCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BUL | TSCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.24 | $18.16 |
| 1D performance | -0.35% | -0.60% |
| AuM | $119.26 M | $38.95 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.55% |
BUL | TSCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | AMG |
| Benchmark | Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 31 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 2, 2019 | December 29, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BUL and TSCM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, BUL is down -1.65% year-to-date (YTD), while TSCM has lost -5.49%. That puts BUL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BUL or TSCM?
Year-to-date, the BUL ETF saw +$8M in flows, compared to +$38M for TSCM.
Which ETF is bigger: BUL or TSCM?
As of March 13, 2026, BUL holds $119.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while TSCM manages $38.95 M.
What sectors do the BUL and TSCM ETFs invest in?
BUL leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Industrials. Meanwhile, TSCM focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the BUL ETF and TSCM ETF?
BUL top holdings include NEWMONT CORP, HCA HEALTHCARE and CARNIVAL. TSCM holds in its top three: REGAL REXNORD CORP, FLOOR AND DECOR HOLDINGS and CHENIERE ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: BUL or TSCM?
BUL holds 50 securities with 56.78% of its assets in the top 15. TSCM has 31 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.39%.
There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow
Pacer Cash Cows ETFs: Investing in Quality Stocks
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
