Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BULvsQMOMETF Comparison
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) belongs to the US Large Cap Growth segment. Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. BUL's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Industrials. In contrast, QMOM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. BUL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.29% for QMOM. BUL is down -1.65% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. QMOM performs better with 2.64% YTD performance, and +$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BUL and QMOM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BUL vs QMOM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BUL QMOM | -4.06%-5.24% | -2.18%+2.12% | -1.65%+2.64% | +26.27%+21.22% | +66.16%+58.75% | +60.73%+27.03% |
| Flows | BUL QMOM | +$6K+$2M | +$16M+$7M | +$8M+$7M | +$30M+$22M | +$51M+$151M | +$94M+$183M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BUL QMOM | +15.13%+25.84% | +23.13%+24.68% | +19.34%+21.78% | +21.74%+24.65% |
| Max drawdown | BUL QMOM | -5.89%-9.26% | -15.97%-14.73% | -23.19%-26.41% | -27.24%-26.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | BUL QMOM | 15d11d | 44d50d | 210d414d | 855d414d |
BUL | QMOM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.24 | $66.97 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $54.43 | $68.15 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BUL | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BUL | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.24 | $66.97 |
| 1D performance | -0.35% | -1.73% |
| AuM | $119.26 M | $356.36 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.29% |
BUL | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Alpha Architect |
| Benchmark | Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 47 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 2, 2019 | December 2, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BUL and QMOM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, BUL is down -1.65% year-to-date (YTD), while QMOM has returned 2.64%. That puts QMOM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BUL or QMOM?
Year-to-date, the BUL ETF saw +$8M in flows, compared to +$7M for QMOM.
Which ETF is more volatile: BUL or QMOM?
Over the past year, BUL had a volatility of 23.13%, while QMOM experienced 24.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: BUL or QMOM?
As of March 13, 2026, BUL holds $119.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while QMOM manages $356.36 M.
What sectors do the BUL and QMOM ETFs invest in?
BUL leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Industrials. Meanwhile, QMOM focuses on Industrials, Materials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the BUL ETF and QMOM ETF?
BUL top holdings include NEWMONT CORP, HCA HEALTHCARE and CARNIVAL. QMOM holds in its top three: ENERGY FUELS, COEUR MINING INC and GB00BRXH2664.
Which ETF is more diversified: BUL or QMOM?
BUL holds 50 securities with 56.78% of its assets in the top 15. QMOM has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.45%.
There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow
Pacer Cash Cows ETFs: Investing in Quality Stocks
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
