BULvsMCOWETF Comparison
VS
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) belongs to the US Large Cap Growth segment. Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. BUL's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Consumer Services and Technology. In contrast, MCOW's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. BUL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.49% for MCOW. BUL is up 12.65% year-to-date (YTD) with +$27M in YTD flows. MCOW performs worse with 9.47% YTD performance, and -$4K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BUL and MCOW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BUL vs MCOW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BUL MCOW | -2.67%-3.56% | +5.92%+1.98% | +12.65%+9.47% | +16.02%+3.27% | +73.31%n/a | +65.14%n/a |
| Flows | BUL MCOW | +$22M- | +$19M- | +$27M-$4K | +$51M-$4K | +$75M- | +$110M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BUL MCOW | +14.82%+14.74% | +16.75%+17.28% | +19.42%n/a | +21.93%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BUL MCOW | -5.49%-6.58% | -9.07%-14.99% | -23.19%n/a | -27.24%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BUL MCOW | 24d36d | 49d246d | 210dn/a | 855dn/a |
Trading data
BUL | MCOW | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $62.06 | |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $62.71 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BUL | MCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BUL | MCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $62.06 | – |
| 1D performance | -1.04% | – |
| AuM | $155.22 M | $1.07 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.49% |
Characteristics
BUL | MCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index | S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index |
| N° of holdings | 48 | 77 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 2, 2019 | August 27, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BUL
USA
92.74%
Other
7.26%
MCOW
USA
93.56%
Other
6.44%
Sectors
BUL
Healthcare
27.2%
Consumer Services
17.87%
Technology
13%
Industrials
11.1%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.74%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.01%
Other
15.08%
MCOW
Technology
35.24%
Industrials
17.43%
Healthcare
14.85%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.06%
Other
23.42%
Advertisement
Diversification
BUL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
57.54%
MCOW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.14%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
BUL
Booking Holdings, Inc.
5.71%
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
5.07%
Uber Technologies, Inc.
4.99%
Newmont Corp.
4.56%
Expedia Group, Inc.
4.53%
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
4.15%
Tapestry, Inc.
3.94%
TechnipFMC plc
3.66%
VeriSign, Inc.
3.38%
Okta, Inc.
3.16%
Incyte Corp.
3.05%
First Solar, Inc.
2.90%
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
2.82%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
2.81%
United Therapeutics Corp.
2.81%
MCOW
Everpure, Inc.
4.91%
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
3.65%
Lattice Semiconductor Corp.
3.62%
DocuSign, Inc.
3.60%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
3.58%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
3.03%
Exelixis, Inc.
2.67%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
2.57%
Jazz Pharmaceuticals Plc
2.52%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
2.32%
Rambus, Inc.
2.29%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
2.18%
DT Midstream, Inc.
2.15%
Qualys, Inc.
2.03%
Okta, Inc.
2.02%
Frequently asked questions about BUL and MCOW
How have the BUL and MCOW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, BUL is up 12.65% year-to-date (YTD), while MCOW has returned 9.47%. That puts BUL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BUL or MCOW?
Year-to-date, the BUL ETF saw +$27M in flows, compared to -$4K for MCOW.
Which ETF is more volatile: BUL or MCOW?
Over the past year, BUL had a volatility of 16.75%, while MCOW experienced 17.28%.
Which ETF is bigger: BUL or MCOW?
As of September 18, 2026, BUL holds $155.22 M in assets under management (AUM), while MCOW manages $1.07 M.
What sectors do the BUL and MCOW ETFs invest in?
BUL leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Consumer Services and Technology. Meanwhile, MCOW focuses on Technology, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the BUL ETF and MCOW ETF?
BUL top holdings include Booking Holdings, Inc., HCA Healthcare, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc.. MCOW holds in its top three: Everpure, Inc., Manhattan Associates, Inc. and Lattice Semiconductor Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: BUL or MCOW?
BUL holds 48 securities with 57.54% of its assets in the top 15. MCOW has 77 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.14%.
Advertisement
Latest news about BUL & MCOW
There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow
October 10, 2024
BUL
Pacer Cash Cows ETFs: Investing in Quality Stocks
April 28, 2023
BUL
Advertisement
Advertisement
