BULvsJMIDETF Comparison
VS
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) belongs to the US Large Cap Growth segment. Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) is part of the US Mid Cap Growth segment. BUL's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Consumer Services and Industrials. In contrast, JMID's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. BUL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.3% for JMID. BUL is up 14.78% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. JMID performs worse with 9.75% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BUL and JMID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BUL vs JMID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/05/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BUL JMID | +5.20%+1.04% | +10.40%+1.96% | +14.78%+9.75% | +22.93%+9.14% | +75.96%n/a | +67.73%n/a |
| Flows | BUL JMID | -- | -$6M+$5M | +$5M+$3M | +$32M-$3M | +$51M- | +$91M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BUL JMID | +17.97%+17.30% | +16.84%+17.30% | +19.38%n/a | +21.87%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BUL JMID | -4.96%-6.38% | -9.07%-10.82% | -23.19%n/a | -27.24%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BUL JMID | 23d65d | 49d171d | 210dn/a | 855dn/a |
Trading data
BUL | JMID | |
Last sale 8/6/2026 at 1:30 PM | $62.96 | $31.60 |
| Previous close 08/05/2026 | $63.34 | $31.84 |
| Consolidated volume 08/05/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
JMID
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBUL | JMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/6/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BUL | JMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $62.96 | $31.60 |
| 1D performance | -0.59% | -0.75% |
| AuM | $136.01 M | $24.66 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.3% |
Characteristics
BUL | JMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Janus Henderson Investors |
| Benchmark | Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 49 | 93 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 2, 2019 | September 17, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BUL
USA
92.49%
Other
7.51%
JMID
USA
97.24%
Other
2.76%
Sectors
BUL
Healthcare
26.3%
Consumer Services
17.07%
Industrials
13.59%
Technology
12.2%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.22%
Other
21.62%
JMID
Technology
35.67%
Industrials
18.31%
Healthcare
11.68%
Finance
8.5%
Consumer Services
7.11%
Other
18.72%
Advertisement
Diversification
BUL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
56.13%
JMID
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.07%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
BUL
Uber Technologies, Inc.
5.49%
Booking Holdings, Inc.
5.46%
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
5.02%
Newmont Corp.
4.76%
Expedia Group, Inc.
4.10%
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
4.06%
Tapestry, Inc.
3.84%
First Solar, Inc.
3.34%
TechnipFMC plc
3.34%
VeriSign, Inc.
3.03%
United Therapeutics Corp.
2.99%
Incyte Corp.
2.96%
Okta, Inc.
2.81%
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
2.73%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
2.20%
JMID
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
3.40%
Teradyne, Inc.
3.12%
Astera Labs, Inc.
2.34%
Tapestry, Inc.
2.21%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
2.17%
Datadog, Inc.
2.16%
DexCom, Inc.
2.12%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
2.11%
Snowflake, Inc.
2.09%
Expedia Group, Inc.
2.02%
HEICO Corp.
2.01%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
1.88%
GoDaddy, Inc.
1.83%
Jabil, Inc.
1.82%
eBay, Inc.
1.79%
Frequently asked questions about BUL and JMID
How have the BUL and JMID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 5, 2026, BUL is up 14.78% year-to-date (YTD), while JMID has returned 9.75%. That puts BUL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BUL or JMID?
Year-to-date, the BUL ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$3M for JMID.
Which ETF is more volatile: BUL or JMID?
Over the past year, BUL had a volatility of 16.84%, while JMID experienced 17.3%.
Which ETF is bigger: BUL or JMID?
As of August 5, 2026, BUL holds $136.01 M in assets under management (AUM), while JMID manages $24.66 M.
What sectors do the BUL and JMID ETFs invest in?
BUL leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Consumer Services and Industrials. Meanwhile, JMID focuses on Technology, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the BUL ETF and JMID ETF?
BUL top holdings include Uber Technologies, Inc., Booking Holdings, Inc. and HCA Healthcare, Inc.. JMID holds in its top three: Comfort Systems USA, Inc., Teradyne, Inc. and Astera Labs, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: BUL or JMID?
BUL holds 49 securities with 56.13% of its assets in the top 15. JMID has 93 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.07%.
Advertisement
Latest news about BUL & JMID
There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow
October 10, 2024
BUL
Pacer Cash Cows ETFs: Investing in Quality Stocks
April 28, 2023
BUL
Advertisement
Advertisement
