Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BULvsIWPETF Comparison
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) belongs to the US Large Cap Growth segment. iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) is part of the US Mid Cap Growth segment. BUL's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Industrials. In contrast, IWP's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Industrials. BUL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.23% for IWP. BUL is down -1.65% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. IWP performs worse with -5.27% YTD performance, and -$248M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BUL and IWP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BUL vs IWP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BUL IWP | -4.06%-3.46% | -2.18%-6.15% | -1.65%-5.27% | +26.27%+13.27% | +66.16%+52.28% | +60.73%+27.59% |
| Flows | BUL IWP | +$6K+$266M | +$16M+$56M | +$8M-$248M | +$30M+$1.42B | +$51M+$2.13B | +$94M+$781M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BUL IWP | +15.13%+18.14% | +23.13%+23.41% | +19.34%+19.23% | +21.74%+22.37% |
| Max drawdown | BUL IWP | -5.89%-8.63% | -15.97%-16.33% | -23.19%-25.34% | -27.24%-38.70% |
| Max drawdown duration | BUL IWP | 15d66d | 44d38d | 210d134d | 855d1059d |
BUL | IWP | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.24 | $129.63 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $54.43 | $129.88 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BUL | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BUL | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.24 | $129.63 |
| 1D performance | -0.35% | -0.19% |
| AuM | $119.26 M | $19.21 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.23% |
BUL | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index | Russell Midcap Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 245 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 2, 2019 | July 17, 2001 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BUL and IWP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, BUL is down -1.65% year-to-date (YTD), while IWP has lost -5.27%. That puts BUL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BUL or IWP?
Year-to-date, the BUL ETF saw +$8M in flows, compared to -$248M for IWP.
Which ETF is more volatile: BUL or IWP?
Over the past year, BUL had a volatility of 23.13%, while IWP experienced 23.41%.
Which ETF is bigger: BUL or IWP?
As of March 13, 2026, BUL holds $119.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWP manages $19.21 B.
What sectors do the BUL and IWP ETFs invest in?
BUL leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Industrials. Meanwhile, IWP focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the BUL ETF and IWP ETF?
BUL top holdings include NEWMONT CORP, HCA HEALTHCARE and CARNIVAL. IWP holds in its top three: ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP, HOWMET AEROSPACE INC and VERTIV HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: BUL or IWP?
BUL holds 50 securities with 56.78% of its assets in the top 15. IWP has 281 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.64%.
There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow
Pacer Cash Cows ETFs: Investing in Quality Stocks
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
