Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BUGvsHACKETF Comparison
Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) belong to the same industry segment: Cybersecurity. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Information Technology. BUG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.51%, versus 0.6% for HACK. BUG is down -12.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$20M in YTD flows. HACK performs better with -2.86% YTD performance, and -$77M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BUG and HACK below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BUG vs HACK performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BUG HACK | -4.68%+0.13% | -15.16%-4.56% | -12.81%-2.86% | -16.28%+9.08% | +23.20%+76.11% | +3.31%+36.42% |
| Flows | BUG HACK | +$3M-$19M | -$12M-$92M | +$20M-$77M | +$170M-$151M | +$71M-$283M | +$223M-$607M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BUG HACK | +29.20%+23.93% | +26.31%+25.19% | +23.34%+21.17% | +26.98%+22.91% |
| Max drawdown | BUG HACK | -22.90%-14.05% | -34.94%-20.50% | -34.94%-21.58% | -41.52%-38.73% |
| Max drawdown duration | BUG HACK | 81d81d | 247d156d | 247d106d | 1120d1016d |
BUG | HACK | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.53 | $77.91 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $26.48 | $77.97 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BUG | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BUG | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.53 | $77.91 |
| 1D performance | +0.19% | -0.08% |
| AuM | $844.55 M | $1.96 B |
| E/R | 0.51% | 0.6% |
BUG | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | Indxx Cybersecurity Index | ISE Cyber Security Select Index |
| N° of holdings | 26 | 23 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 25, 2019 | November 12, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BUG and HACK ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, BUG is down -12.81% year-to-date (YTD), while HACK has lost -2.86%. That puts HACK better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BUG or HACK?
Year-to-date, the BUG ETF saw +$20M in flows, compared to -$77M for HACK.
Which ETF is more volatile: BUG or HACK?
Over the past year, BUG had a volatility of 26.31%, while HACK experienced 25.19%.
Which ETF is bigger: BUG or HACK?
As of March 13, 2026, BUG holds $844.55 M in assets under management (AUM), while HACK manages $1.96 B.
What sectors do the BUG and HACK ETFs invest in?
BUG leans toward sectors like Information Technology. Meanwhile, HACK focuses on Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the BUG ETF and HACK ETF?
BUG top holdings include AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, FORTINET and CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIS. HACK holds in its top three: BROADCOM LIMITED, CISCO-T and NORTHROP GRUMMAN.
Which ETF is more diversified: BUG or HACK?
BUG holds 29 securities with 77.35% of its assets in the top 15. HACK has 23 securities and a top 15 weight of 74.57%.
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
