BSRvsCSHIETF Comparison
Beacon Unified Catalyst Fund (BSR) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. BSR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.43%, versus 0.38% for CSHI. BSR is up 5.13% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. CSHI performs worse with 3.83% YTD performance, and +$1.23B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BSR and CSHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BSR vs CSHI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BSR CSHI | +1.59%+0.36% | +1.52%+1.06% | +5.13%+3.83% | +6.08%+4.97% | +27.79%+16.74% | n/an/a |
| Flows | BSR CSHI | -$924K+$186M | -$2M+$570M | -$6M+$1.23B | +$801K+$1.36B | +$1M+$1.84B | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BSR CSHI | +9.86%+0.23% | +9.31%+0.53% | +9.69%+1.10% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BSR CSHI | -3.18%n/a | -6.13%-0.18% | -11.04%-1.52% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BSR CSHI | 63dn/a | 228d6d | 403d20d | n/an/a |
BSR | CSHI | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.56 | $49.61 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $30.43 | $49.59 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
BSR | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.56 | $49.61 |
| 1D performance | +0.43% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $33.83 M | $2.03 B |
| E/R | 1.43% | 0.38% |
BSR | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Beacon Capital Management | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 18, 2023 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
