BOILvsUCOETF Comparison
VS
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas ETF (BOIL) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil ETF (UCO) belong to the same industry segment: Leveraged Commodity. BOIL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.39%, versus 1.47% for UCO. BOIL is down -62.02% year-to-date (YTD) with -$143M in YTD flows. UCO performs better with 249.94% YTD performance, and -$489M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BOIL and UCO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BOIL vs UCO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BOIL UCO | -17.73%+27.71% | -12.78%+79.76% | -62.02%+249.94% | -68.51%+219.54% | -97.16%+108.77% | -99.88%+178.62% |
| Flows | BOIL UCO | +$158M-$19M | +$81M-$132M | -$143M-$489M | -$166M-$529M | +$629M-$627M | +$2.66B-$1.84B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BOIL UCO | +66.30%+48.12% | +111.79%+64.45% | +106.76%+55.51% | +122.51%+62.67% |
| Max drawdown | BOIL UCO | -30.67%-14.23% | -80.45%-38.76% | -97.49%-48.72% | -99.93%-66.84% |
| Max drawdown duration | BOIL UCO | 34d9d | 325d114d | 1093d698d | 1605d1582d |
Trading data
BOIL | UCO | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $17.07 | $66.66 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $17.45 | $64.89 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BOIL | UCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BOIL | UCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $17.07 | $66.66 |
| 1D performance | -2.18% | +2.73% |
| AuM | $393.25 M | $516.25 M |
| E/R | 1.39% | 1.47% |
Characteristics
BOIL | UCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | ProShares |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex | Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Commodities | Commodities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 10, 2011 | November 24, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BOIL
Data will be available soon
UCO
Data will be available soon
Sectors
BOIL
Data will be available soon
UCO
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
BOIL
Data will be available soon
UCO
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
BOIL
Data will be available soon
UCO
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about BOIL and UCO
How have the BOIL and UCO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 28, 2026, BOIL is down -62.02% year-to-date (YTD), while UCO has returned 249.94%. That puts UCO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BOIL or UCO?
Year-to-date, the BOIL ETF saw -$143M in flows, compared to -$489M for UCO.
Which ETF is more volatile: BOIL or UCO?
Over the past year, BOIL had a volatility of 111.79%, while UCO experienced 64.45%.
Which ETF is bigger: BOIL or UCO?
As of October 28, 2026, BOIL holds $393.25 M in assets under management (AUM), while UCO manages $516.25 M.
Advertisement
Latest news about BOIL & UCO
Advertisement
