Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BMVPvsWTVETF Comparison
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF (BMVP) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. BMVP's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, WTV's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. BMVP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.12% for WTV. BMVP is up 4.95% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1M in YTD flows. WTV performs worse with 2.68% YTD performance, and +$497M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BMVP and WTV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BMVP vs WTV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BMVP WTV | -2.51%-4.87% | +3.04%+1.54% | +4.95%+2.68% | +10.86%+19.88% | +52.70%+78.19% | +40.31%+86.65% |
| Flows | BMVP WTV | -+$277M | -$1M+$545M | -$1M+$497M | -$16M+$1.69B | -$22M+$2.23B | -$50M+$2.31B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BMVP WTV | +10.61%+11.48% | +14.35%+18.00% | +12.52%+15.62% | +16.47%+17.21% |
| Max drawdown | BMVP WTV | -3.25%-4.89% | -11.10%-13.56% | -15.00%-18.48% | -26.49%-19.31% |
| Max drawdown duration | BMVP WTV | 31d29d | 43d46d | 374d233d | 799d392d |
BMVP | WTV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $51.20 | $95.71 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $51.30 | $96.10 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BMVP | WTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BMVP | WTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.20 | $95.71 |
| 1D performance | -0.19% | -0.41% |
| AuM | $102.43 M | $2.69 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.12% |
BMVP | WTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg MVP Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 56 | 119 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 1, 2003 | February 23, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BMVP and WTV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, BMVP is up 4.95% year-to-date (YTD), while WTV has returned 2.68%. That puts BMVP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BMVP or WTV?
Year-to-date, the BMVP ETF saw -$1M in flows, compared to +$497M for WTV.
Which ETF is more volatile: BMVP or WTV?
Over the past year, BMVP had a volatility of 14.35%, while WTV experienced 18%.
Which ETF is bigger: BMVP or WTV?
As of March 11, 2026, BMVP holds $102.43 M in assets under management (AUM), while WTV manages $2.69 B.
What sectors do the BMVP and WTV ETFs invest in?
BMVP leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. Meanwhile, WTV focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the BMVP ETF and WTV ETF?
BMVP top holdings include HALLIBURTON, LOCKHEED MARTIN and HOME DEPOT. WTV holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, META PLATFORMS and WALMART INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: BMVP or WTV?
BMVP holds 56 securities with 28.68% of its assets in the top 15. WTV has 120 securities and a top 15 weight of 23.97%.
The Cheapest Active ETFs of 2025
Finetuning Value and Growth ETF Allocations Beyond the Russell 1000 Index
Two Ways to Invest in Quality with WisdomTree ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
