Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BMEDvsIXJETF Comparison
iShares Health Innovation Active ETF (BMED) belongs to the Healthcare Technology segment. iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) is part of the Global Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. BMED is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.77%, versus 0.4% for IXJ. BMED is down -5.49% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. IXJ performs better with -3.07% YTD performance, and -$688M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BMED and IXJ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BMED vs IXJ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BMED IXJ | -6.03%-6.62% | -5.68%-3.29% | -5.49%-3.07% | +16.79%+5.92% | +27.36%+23.67% | -1.83%+32.59% |
| Flows | BMED IXJ | +$1M-$599M | +$4M-$664M | +$4M-$688M | +$7M-$427M | +$4M-$883M | +$5M+$219M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BMED IXJ | +15.26%+13.13% | +17.92%+16.82% | +15.51%+13.09% | +17.58%+13.81% |
| Max drawdown | BMED IXJ | -10.40%-7.40% | -14.01%-10.89% | -19.76%-18.04% | -33.96%-18.04% |
| Max drawdown duration | BMED IXJ | 50d12d | 113d196d | 237d490d | 1586d490d |
BMED | IXJ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.63 | $94.30 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $28.78 | $94.78 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BMED | IXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BMED | IXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.63 | $94.30 |
| 1D performance | -0.52% | -0.51% |
| AuM | $10.31 M | $3.71 B |
| E/R | 0.77% | 0.4% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BMED and IXJ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, BMED is down -5.49% year-to-date (YTD), while IXJ has lost -3.07%. That puts IXJ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BMED or IXJ?
Year-to-date, the BMED ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to -$688M for IXJ.
Which ETF is more volatile: BMED or IXJ?
Over the past year, BMED had a volatility of 17.92%, while IXJ experienced 16.82%.
Which ETF is bigger: BMED or IXJ?
As of March 13, 2026, BMED holds $10.31 M in assets under management (AUM), while IXJ manages $3.71 B.
What sectors do the BMED and IXJ ETFs invest in?
BMED leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, IXJ focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the BMED ETF and IXJ ETF?
BMED top holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON, GILEAD SCIENCES and EXACT SCIENCES. IXJ holds in its top three: LILLY, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and ABBVIE.
Which ETF is more diversified: BMED or IXJ?
BMED holds 144 securities with 38.18% of its assets in the top 15. IXJ has 115 securities and a top 15 weight of 55.7%.
Healthcare Funds on the Rise
Healthcare Stocks Rebound
Continued tightening of the U.S. labor market
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
