Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BMEDvsHRTSETF Comparison
iShares Health Innovation Active ETF (BMED) belongs to the Healthcare Technology segment. Tema GLP-1, Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) is part of the Tomorrow's Treatments segment. BMED's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, HRTS's top sector exposures are Health Care BMED is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.77%, versus 0.99% for HRTS. BMED is down -5.49% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. HRTS performs better with -4.67% YTD performance, and -$713K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BMED and HRTS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BMED vs HRTS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BMED HRTS | -6.03%-5.84% | -5.68%-4.63% | -5.49%-4.67% | +16.79%+15.66% | +27.36%n/a | -1.83%n/a |
| Flows | BMED HRTS | +$1M-$2M | +$4M+$712K | +$4M-$713K | +$7M-$17M | +$4M- | +$5M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BMED HRTS | +15.26%+14.54% | +17.92%+17.68% | +15.51%n/a | +17.58%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BMED HRTS | -10.40%-7.89% | -14.01%-13.50% | -19.76%n/a | -33.96%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BMED HRTS | 50d65d | 113d163d | 237dn/a | 1586dn/a |
BMED | HRTS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.63 | $33.67 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $28.78 | $33.85 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
BMED | HRTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.63 | $33.67 |
| 1D performance | -0.52% | -0.54% |
| AuM | $10.31 M | $51.53 M |
| E/R | 0.77% | 0.99% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BMED and HRTS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, BMED is down -5.49% year-to-date (YTD), while HRTS has lost -4.67%. That puts HRTS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BMED or HRTS?
Year-to-date, the BMED ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to -$713K for HRTS.
Which ETF is more volatile: BMED or HRTS?
Over the past year, BMED had a volatility of 17.92%, while HRTS experienced 17.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: BMED or HRTS?
As of March 13, 2026, BMED holds $10.31 M in assets under management (AUM), while HRTS manages $51.53 M.
What sectors do the BMED and HRTS ETFs invest in?
BMED leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, HRTS focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the BMED ETF and HRTS ETF?
BMED top holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON, GILEAD SCIENCES and EXACT SCIENCES. HRTS holds in its top three: LILLY, US7711951043 and JOHNSON&JOHNSON.
Which ETF is more diversified: BMED or HRTS?
BMED holds 144 securities with 38.18% of its assets in the top 15. HRTS has 44 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.09%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
