Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BKLCvsVOTEETF Comparison
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and TCW Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. BKLC's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, VOTE's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. BKLC is down -0.9% year-to-date (YTD) with +$388M in YTD flows. VOTE performs better with -0.89% YTD performance, and +$48M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BKLC and VOTE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BKLC vs VOTE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BKLC VOTE | -2.12%-2.17% | -1.54%-1.51% | -0.90%-0.89% | +22.65%+22.37% | +89.65%+84.62% | +89.38%n/a |
| Flows | BKLC VOTE | +$199M+$39M | +$419M+$43M | +$388M+$48M | +$1.58B+$100M | +$2.27B+$207M | +$3.73B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BKLC VOTE | +11.78%+11.67% | +18.40%+18.40% | +15.12%+15.14% | +17.54%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BKLC VOTE | -3.45%-3.45% | -13.92%-13.92% | -19.17%-19.12% | -26.14%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BKLC VOTE | 42d42d | 45d45d | 126d126d | 707dn/a |
BKLC | VOTE | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 3:14 PM | $127.62 | |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $129.41 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BKLC | VOTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BKLC | VOTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $127.62 | – |
| 1D performance | -1.38% | – |
| AuM | $5.27 B | $972.34 M |
| E/R | 0% | 0.05% |
BKLC | VOTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | BNY Mellon | TCW |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS United States 500 Index | Morningstar US Large Cap Select Index |
| N° of holdings | 470 | 469 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 7, 2020 | June 22, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BKLC and VOTE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, BKLC is down -0.9% year-to-date (YTD), while VOTE has lost -0.89%. That puts VOTE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BKLC or VOTE?
Year-to-date, the BKLC ETF saw +$388M in flows, compared to +$48M for VOTE.
Which ETF is more volatile: BKLC or VOTE?
Over the past year, BKLC had a volatility of 18.4%, while VOTE experienced 18.4%.
Which ETF is bigger: BKLC or VOTE?
As of March 10, 2026, BKLC holds $5.27 B in assets under management (AUM), while VOTE manages $972.34 M.
What sectors do the BKLC and VOTE ETFs invest in?
BKLC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, VOTE focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the BKLC ETF and VOTE ETF?
BKLC top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. VOTE holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: BKLC or VOTE?
BKLC holds 504 securities with 42.93% of its assets in the top 15. VOTE has 490 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.47%.
State Street Global Advisors' 2024 US ETF Impact Survey: Key Takeaways and ETFs to Watch
Meet the Ultra-Affordable, Zero-Expense Ratio ETFs from BNY Mellon
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
