Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BKLCvsSTRVETF Comparison
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and Strive 500 ETF (STRV) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. BKLC is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD) with +$382M in YTD flows. STRV performs worse with -1% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BKLC and STRV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BKLC vs STRV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BKLC STRV | -2.24%-2.13% | -0.67%-1.62% | -0.69%-1.00% | +22.90%+22.39% | +87.66%+84.29% | +90.64%n/a |
| Flows | BKLC STRV | +$197M-$7M | +$414M-$8M | +$382M+$3M | +$1.58B+$58M | +$2.26B+$591M | +$3.72B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BKLC STRV | +11.86%+11.60% | +18.43%+18.34% | +15.14%+15.02% | +17.54%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BKLC STRV | -3.45%-3.43% | -13.92%-13.87% | -19.17%-19.09% | -26.14%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BKLC STRV | 41d57d | 45d45d | 126d126d | 707dn/a |
BKLC | STRV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $129.41 | $43.61 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $129.50 | $43.60 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BKLC | STRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BKLC | STRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $129.41 | $43.61 |
| 1D performance | -0.07% | +0.01% |
| AuM | $5.27 B | $1.01 B |
| E/R | 0% | 0.0545% |
BKLC | STRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | BNY Mellon | Strive Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS United States 500 Index | Bloomberg 500 Index |
| N° of holdings | 470 | 469 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 7, 2020 | September 15, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BKLC and STRV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, BKLC is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD), while STRV has lost -1%. That puts BKLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BKLC or STRV?
Year-to-date, the BKLC ETF saw +$382M in flows, compared to +$3M for STRV.
Which ETF is more volatile: BKLC or STRV?
Over the past year, BKLC had a volatility of 18.43%, while STRV experienced 18.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: BKLC or STRV?
As of March 9, 2026, BKLC holds $5.27 B in assets under management (AUM), while STRV manages $1.01 B.
What sectors do the BKLC and STRV ETFs invest in?
BKLC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, STRV focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the BKLC ETF and STRV ETF?
BKLC top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. STRV holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: BKLC or STRV?
BKLC holds 504 securities with 42.93% of its assets in the top 15. STRV has 499 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.32%.
State Street Global Advisors' 2024 US ETF Impact Survey: Key Takeaways and ETFs to Watch
Meet the Ultra-Affordable, Zero-Expense Ratio ETFs from BNY Mellon
Strive Asset Management Moves Entire Lineup of ETFs to NYSE Floor
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
