Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BKLCvsBBUSETF Comparison
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. BKLC is down -0.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$388M in YTD flows. BBUS performs worse with -3.2% YTD performance, and +$492M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BKLC and BBUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BKLC vs BBUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BKLC BBUS | -2.17%-2.87% | -1.81%-2.79% | -0.97%-3.20% | +23.39%+21.31% | +89.42%+79.45% | +86.96%+74.97% |
| Flows | BKLC BBUS | +$184M+$92M | +$419M+$609M | +$388M+$492M | +$1.48B+$2.13B | +$2.27B+$4.10B | +$3.74B+$5.10B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BKLC BBUS | +11.78%+11.87% | +18.38%+18.33% | +15.12%+14.95% | +17.53%+17.10% |
| Max drawdown | BKLC BBUS | -3.45%-5.04% | -13.92%-13.90% | -19.17%-19.04% | -26.14%-25.46% |
| Max drawdown duration | BKLC BBUS | 43d45d | 45d45d | 126d126d | 707d715d |
BKLC | BBUS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $126.70 | $119.33 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $127.44 | $120.07 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BKLC | BBUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BKLC | BBUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $126.70 | $119.33 |
| 1D performance | -0.58% | -0.62% |
| AuM | $5.26 B | $7.03 B |
| E/R | 0% | 0.02% |
BKLC | BBUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | BNY Mellon | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS United States 500 Index | Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index |
| N° of holdings | 470 | 461 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 7, 2020 | March 12, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BKLC and BBUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, BKLC is down -0.97% year-to-date (YTD), while BBUS has lost -3.2%. That puts BKLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BKLC or BBUS?
Year-to-date, the BKLC ETF saw +$388M in flows, compared to +$492M for BBUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: BKLC or BBUS?
Over the past year, BKLC had a volatility of 18.38%, while BBUS experienced 18.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: BKLC or BBUS?
As of March 11, 2026, BKLC holds $5.26 B in assets under management (AUM), while BBUS manages $7.03 B.
What sectors do the BKLC and BBUS ETFs invest in?
BKLC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, BBUS focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the BKLC ETF and BBUS ETF?
BKLC top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. BBUS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: BKLC or BBUS?
BKLC holds 504 securities with 42.93% of its assets in the top 15. BBUS has 491 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.79%.
State Street Global Advisors' 2024 US ETF Impact Survey: Key Takeaways and ETFs to Watch
Meet the Ultra-Affordable, Zero-Expense Ratio ETFs from BNY Mellon
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
