Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BCSMvsPFUTETF Comparison
Baron SMID Cap ETF (BCSM) and Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. BCSM's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. In contrast, PFUT's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. BCSM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.65% for PFUT. BCSM is down -4.47% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. PFUT performs better with -4.39% YTD performance, and -$386M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BCSM and PFUT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BCSM vs PFUT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BCSM PFUT | -1.29%-3.10% | -5.02%-7.85% | -4.47%-4.39% | n/a+9.13% | n/a+42.01% | n/an/a |
| Flows | BCSM PFUT | +$919K-$396M | +$19M-$380M | +$3M-$386M | --$329M | --$222M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BCSM PFUT | +18.42%+16.94% | n/a+22.10% | n/a+18.49% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BCSM PFUT | -11.12%-9.19% | n/a-16.31% | n/a-27.52% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BCSM PFUT | 54d90d | n/a45d | n/a462d | n/an/a |
BCSM | PFUT | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 7:07 PM | $22.30 | $23.86 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $22.87 | $24.22 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
BCSM | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.30 | $23.86 |
| 1D performance | -2.49% | -1.49% |
| AuM | $17.96 M | $4.84 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.65% |
BCSM | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Baron Capital | Putnam |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 39 | 62 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 12, 2025 | May 25, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BCSM and PFUT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, BCSM is down -4.47% year-to-date (YTD), while PFUT has lost -4.39%. That puts PFUT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BCSM or PFUT?
Year-to-date, the BCSM ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to -$386M for PFUT.
Which ETF is bigger: BCSM or PFUT?
As of March 10, 2026, BCSM holds $17.96 M in assets under management (AUM), while PFUT manages $4.84 M.
What sectors do the BCSM and PFUT ETFs invest in?
BCSM leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, PFUT focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the BCSM ETF and PFUT ETF?
BCSM top holdings include MERCURY SYSTEMS INC, US19247G1076 and BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING. PFUT holds in its top three: VERTIV HOLDINGS, HILTON INC and PENUMBRA.
Which ETF is more diversified: BCSM or PFUT?
BCSM holds 40 securities with 35.14% of its assets in the top 15. PFUT has 64 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.36%.
Ask the Manager: Michael Baron on the Case for Active Management
Baron Capital Debuts Three Active ETFs on NYSE
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
