Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BCSMvsGLRYETF Comparison
Baron SMID Cap ETF (BCSM) and Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. BCSM's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. In contrast, GLRY's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. BCSM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.96% for GLRY. BCSM is down -5.18% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. GLRY performs better with 6.86% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BCSM and GLRY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BCSM vs GLRY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BCSM GLRY | -1.15%-2.51% | -5.72%+2.47% | -5.18%+6.86% | n/a+34.21% | n/a+67.81% | n/a+32.87% |
| Flows | BCSM GLRY | +$686K+$3M | +$19M+$20M | +$3M+$19M | -+$47M | -+$57M | -+$76M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BCSM GLRY | +18.30%+21.98% | n/a+21.32% | n/a+17.52% | n/a+20.32% |
| Max drawdown | BCSM GLRY | -11.12%-6.18% | n/a-12.46% | n/a-20.66% | n/a-34.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | BCSM GLRY | 55d14d | n/a37d | n/a209d | n/a917d |
BCSM | GLRY | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $22.14 | $37.45 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $22.20 | $37.65 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
BCSM | GLRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.14 | $37.45 |
| 1D performance | -0.27% | -0.53% |
| AuM | $17.82 M | $143.98 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.96% |
BCSM | GLRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Baron Capital | Inspire ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 39 | 32 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 12, 2025 | August 12, 2020 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BCSM and GLRY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, BCSM is down -5.18% year-to-date (YTD), while GLRY has returned 6.86%. That puts GLRY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BCSM or GLRY?
Year-to-date, the BCSM ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$19M for GLRY.
Which ETF is bigger: BCSM or GLRY?
As of March 11, 2026, BCSM holds $17.82 M in assets under management (AUM), while GLRY manages $143.98 M.
What sectors do the BCSM and GLRY ETFs invest in?
BCSM leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, GLRY focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the BCSM ETF and GLRY ETF?
BCSM top holdings include MERCURY SYSTEMS INC, US19247G1076 and BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING. GLRY holds in its top three: AMPHENOL, KLA CORPORATION and CURTISS WRIGHT.
Which ETF is more diversified: BCSM or GLRY?
BCSM holds 40 securities with 35.14% of its assets in the top 15. GLRY has 32 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.93%.
Ask the Manager: Michael Baron on the Case for Active Management
Baron Capital Debuts Three Active ETFs on NYSE
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
